My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/04/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/04/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:22:35 PM
Creation date
3/17/2025 2:22:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/23/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 9, 1984 <br />Regular Meeting Page Nine <br />Mrs. Povlitzki asked the Council why their ex -establish- <br />ment, Loose food service. Shw easked as lthe dCouncil to rtoewithout now reviewtheir a <br />operation and be fair in monitoring all similar <br />businesses. <br />Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to call a ten minute <br />recess. <br />5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />The meeting was called back to order at 8:53 PM. <br />Mr. Povlitzki apologized to Mayor McCarty for an <br />erroneous statement he had made earlier in the meeting, <br />regarding a mistaken identity. <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated his memo of 10. Consideration <br />April 4, 1984 to the Council provides the history 3rd Step <br />of the case, along with supporting documentation. Grievance Appe <br />He explained the discussion tonight would be the of Public Work <br />third step in the grievance appeal, with the fourth Employee Larry <br />step being. submittal of the grievance to the Minnesota Decheine <br />Bureau of Mediation Services, and the fifth step being <br />arbitration. <br />Tim Connors, of Local No. 49, stated he was represent- <br />ing Mr. Decheine, and he feels the one day suspension <br />given was out of line. He added he feels that if the <br />people involved were put under oath, the truth would <br />come out. He added that the letters of February 16 and <br />22 indicate discrepencies. <br />Mr. Connors stated he felt it was a waste of his time <br />to have to come and sit through the Council meeting, <br />as he had requested to go directly to the fourth step <br />of the grievance appeal. <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained to Mr. Connor <br />that Mounds View does not have a City Manager form of <br />government, and it would be a significant oversite on <br />his part to not follow the proper procedure and have <br />the third step. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated there was some confusion <br />with the information listed in the letters of February 16 <br />and 22, <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard that the Council <br />rats y the actions of the Clerk/Administrator and <br />instruct him to go to the next step in this matter. <br />ayes 0 nays <br />Motion Carried <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.