Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Coune May 291.1984• <br />Regular Meeting G .1 J Page Four <br />---------- ---------------- --- ------- —---- -----= ­ ------ <br />There was no one present to address the rezoning. <br />Attorney Meyers stated that the record should show <br />that notice was sent on this parcel to the property <br />owner and published in the legal paper. <br />Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened <br />the regular meeting at 8:03 p.m. <br />Motion/Second: Hankner'Linke to have the First 14. First <br />NReading <br />ng o <br />ea rdinance No. 365 Amending the Municipal <br />o. 365 <br />Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled <br />"Specific Rezonings", and waive the reading. <br />4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />There was discussion before the vote was taken on the <br />previous motion. <br />Attorney Meyers indicated that the Council should be <br />aware that this parcel would be brought into conformance with the <br />comprehensive plan with this rezoning. <br />Director Thatcher recommended the hiring of a fulltime 15. Report of <br />temporary worker, Mr. Galen Relash, for a duration of of Public r <br />66 days during the summer. Community e <br />opment <br />Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve the recommended <br />h r ng of days at $5.00/hour. <br />4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Director Thatcher reviewed discussions with the state <br />on the signal light at County Road J and Trunk Highway <br />10. He stated that after the state had proposed a <br />second modification to the intersection and he told <br />them they would have to pay, they decided to stay with <br />the first modification. lie noted that it will all be <br />covered by MSA funds. <br />Attorney Meyers had nothing to report. 16. Report of <br />Atuorney <br />Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and reopened 17' PublicnHearings <br />Rezoniof <br />it at 8:21 p.m. 2901 Highway 10 <br />Mayor McCarty stated that it had been discovered that from B-3 to R-1g nin <br />there was a defect in the notice procedures for the PRezoezo ing 10 <br />next two public hearings on the agenda and therefore from B-3o -2 <br />the Council would not be able to hold the hearings as <br />planned. He further stated that, because of the contro— <br />versial issues surrounding these two rezonings, it was <br />suggested that further meetings wit' `he Planning Commission. <br />