My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/06/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/06/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:54:50 PM
Creation date
3/19/2025 12:54:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/11/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
" May 29, 1984 <br />14ounds View City Council 1 1: Page Seven <br />Regular Meeting-------------------------------------------------------- <br />Jeanette Kilduff, 2213 Co. Rd. H-2, asked about a <br />petition she heard was submitted opposing the re- <br />zoning. Clerk/Administrator Pauley confirmed that <br />there was one filed by 14 property owners and signed <br />by residents and dependents. <br />Peg Mountin, Chairman of the Planning Commission, <br />reviewed Planning Commission discussions regarding <br />the rezoning. She indicated that concerns in the <br />past revolved around the through street and apart- <br />ment type dwellings that were originally proposed <br />under the high residential use and that other con- <br />cerns include the noise level, light intensity and <br />heavy industrial use. She stated that the Planning <br />Commission felt that bermina: was an excellent barrier <br />and constituted an adequate buffer. She pointed out <br />that residents are protected from high intensity <br />lighting under the zoning ordinance and felt that <br />heavy industrial would not be able to meet standards <br />imposed for conditional use permits. Her opinion <br />was that the I-1 was a good alternative and that <br />the birming was sufficient to protect abutting <br />properties. <br />Mayor McCarty asked if anyone was present who signed <br />the petition so that they could substantiate some <br />/~specific concerns that the Council could address. <br />Jeanette Kilduff, 2213 Co. Rd. I1-2, stated that <br />there was a previous concern that residents would <br />be billed for storm sewer. Mayor McCarty replied <br />that residents will not be assessed for this if the <br />property develops. <br />Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened <br />the regular meeting at 9:06 p.m. <br />Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to have the First Read- <br />gcNo. <br />Amending <br />the <br />Entitledl Code <br />ofMounds View byAmending Chapter 41 <br />"Specific Rezonings", and waive the reading. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />There was discussion before the vote was taken on the <br />previous motion. <br />Attorney Meyers indicated that this does bring the <br />property in conformance with the comprehensive plan. <br />Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened <br />the next public hearing at 9:09 P.m - <br />Dreg Holey, 8192 Croveland Rd., asked that the addi- <br />tion be explained. <br />21. First Reading <br />Ord. No. 368 <br />Motion Carried <br />22. Public Hearing: <br />Major Subdiviei <br />(2 lots into 5) <br />of property <br />located at <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.