My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/10/01
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/10/01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 2:21:48 PM
Creation date
3/19/2025 2:21:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/1/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Z <br />MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />i <br />FROM. CLERK-ADMINISTRATO( <br />DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1984 \j <br />SUBJECT: TELEPHONE SYSTEM PROPOSAL <br />As I have advised you in the Administrative Newsletter, Staff <br />has been reviewing the proposals the City received for a "state- <br />of-the-art" telephone system to replace that which we currently <br />rent from Northwestern Bell at a cost of $275.00/month. <br />After eliminating those proposals which exceeded the City's <br />1985 Budget allocation for telephone system purchase/rental, <br />four proposals remained which were demonstrated to me over a <br />one week period of time. Of these four, one, Hauenstein and <br />Burmeister, presented a system which was essentially identical <br />to two other proposals which were at a lower cost. The second, <br />AT&T, presented a hybrid system which could not be considered <br />"state-of-the-art", posed several operational difficulties over <br />the other system, and exceeded our budget when they submitted <br />revised figures. <br />The remaining two proposals, Executone and First Tel, include <br />equipment that would be a significant improvement over the <br />equipment currently in City Hall and are both available to us. <br />under lease/purchase arrangements of 72 and 80 months respectively <br />at a lower cost than provided for in the 1985 Budget. Also, <br />both of these firms had had positive reference checks from users <br />of the same or similar systems. <br />It is my desi;.e at this time to have the two systems demonstrated <br />to City Hall Staff during a special staff meeting and let the <br />Staff decide which system they want. Since neither would exceed <br />the 1985 Budget and they are within $20.00 per month of each other, <br />I would request Council authorization to negotiate a contract <br />with the successful proposer for your approval. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Authorize Staff to negotiate a contract for your <br />approval for lease/purchase of a telephone system from the firm <br />selected by the City [fall Staff after a demonstration of the <br />systems. <br />DFP/mjs <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.