My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/10/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/10/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 2:22:54 PM
Creation date
3/19/2025 2:22:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/22/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The political climate in the community is imponant. The Master Policy Plan, while holding out the greatest <br />potential for the city, also carries the greatest political risk, because council action in public session is <br />usually rc quired. The public furum provides opponents of the program — some agents ano a few insurance <br />companies — an opportunity to mount strong emotional arguments against it. These arguments were elfcc- <br />live In a few California cities early in the program. occasionally reversing the general consensus of the <br />council from a favorable staff recommendation. Th(., endorsement plan carries less political risk as ne formal <br />council action is required. Despite the forum for opposion, in California the Master Policy Plan appears to <br />be the Plan of choice. <br />Once a plan and a participating entity (city, county. JPA, or suilaWe association) is selected and accepted <br />by th': insurance carriers, implementation is straightforward The final step requires only that CIMA identify a <br />local inurpendent insurance agency to ma <br />ket and manage CHIP in the community. <br />h'f.JRAt0Poiice departments do not seem reluctant to cross train fire fighters in burglary p:uc- r.. <br />lion techniques. Therefore. it does not appear that additional city personnel will be required, or that O:aa •. <br />be paid, in order to sustain a fairly high home visit workload level. About the only real cost vJI1 h•t <br />increased usage of vehicles. To be effective, of course, engine companies must not only conduct the sal' ,. <br />and security analyses, but also remain constantly available to respond directly to emergencies. <br />City staff personnel should carefully consider the CHIP features and options and develop a thorough <br />knowledge of program details before selecting an implementation strategy. CIMA is prepared to advise oi, <br />in this context. <br />Section 5 — Marketing CHIP --_ <br />The general marketing concept selected for CHIP employs two independent insurance agencies: <br />1) The CHIP Managing General Agency is ar organization formed expressly for the Program It is <br />called Cooperative Insurance Marketing A sociales, Inc. (CIMA). CIMA will be responsible to <br />the CHIP insurance carriers, under a Marketino and Product Development Agreement, for <br />developing the program in each state with regard to statutes and regulatory measures. CIMA <br />will also be responsible to the cities and the consumers for assisting in the selection of an entry <br />plan and a responsible local independent CHIP insurance agency. CIMA will also be, responsi- <br />ble for developim a local marketing concept in conjunction with the city and the Desicntad <br />CHIP Agent. <br />2) The total indefoo0ent insurance agency (the CHIP oesignated scent) will be rec; v. <br />CIMA. The CHIP appointment by the insurance carriers will be cif•- attrictiv: <br />progressive agents in the community. Larger c mmunities may the <br />more than one agent, however the number of appointment will be rim :: 4r all c?:>: sill <br />pdssibki for other local agents to submit risks through the Designate::: <br />In essence, CIMA will get tree prr ,ram started and tho to :at agency will keep cn„ <br />The insurance carriers will suppon both CIMA and the local insurance agency e,1. ; ,. r.'''': ias c:r <br />makinn and actuarial services, and new product development as required to ensure the; 3I❑s hb <br />Section f — Results and Expectations - <br />CHIP is r, 'lelw idea, hilt m iderlce. is beginning to accl.lnulate which indlcales that the pfe•J ".n1 ;7 itc <br />to horn,?^,vnr.'ri. public &7tety agencies and incremwi:lly, 10 Indeli^nde^! Insuran:. <br />rr c MT, f homeowners to "inn, " public e" ,al 1 1 • the -a: - <br />1 IY; ❑ , Is ucndinely Iniendt l di, art BdUG;lilJnll I. r !r ,•'•' '. <br />?ntercemeJt f l,b'crtunily for !1 1 T I).-., ,. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.