Laserfiche WebLink
for coverage under a CHIP insurance policy at rates very competitive for the community and the <br />coverages desired. It is important to the homeowner that the policy provided be at least equal in <br />coverage, and probably lower or equal in cost as compared to his present insurance. Even though <br />the city benefits financially when losses are minimized, claims settlement must he fair and <br />expeditious if the CHIP is to maintain public confidence over the long term. <br />3) Safety and Security Device Insurance Credits <br />Even though homeowners know that the installation of safety and security devices is brinehr.al, <br />many will not do so unless there is some financial incentive The CHIP will encourage the insm;la;,pn <br />Of such devices through premium discounts which, in aggregate, can lower the annual cosi o! tG: <br />homeowners policy by as much as an additional 15°u <br />4) <br />CHIP returns are defined as those premiums remaining after insurance company retention <br />agent's commissions, and loss related costs are paid. Experience indicates that this concept <br />appealing to homeowners. probably because most would rather see some part of the prewims they <br />must pay in any event remain in the city to help defray the costs of city public safety programs <br />Section 8 — The Home Safety and Security Analysis Program <br />During the development of the CHIP, a group of fire and police officials, functioning as a sub -committee of <br />the CHIP Steering Committee, developed model Home Safety and Security Analysis guidelines. The model <br />is intended only as a list of important elements for cities to use in reviewing their present home "inspection <br />programs or developing new ones. Each city must necessarily establish analysis procedures, elements, and <br />forms in accordance with local policies, ordinances, and codes. Nevertheless, the model does represent an <br />insurance view of what is important, and, within limits, what will be required for sound underwriting. <br />The concept behind the analysis program is simply tg assist the homeowner families in minimizing If:o <br />chances of becoming fire or burglary victims through oversight or inappropriate actions. The analysis pro- <br />gram most be carried out in the spirit of community stdety and be designed to positively reinforce a high <br />level of awareness of fire, theft and injury risks. Table 1 provides the suggested listing of home safely. <br />security, and liability review subject areas. <br />City Personnel Requirements <br />Most cities will have several options as to how home sefety analysis programs will be conducted. In general. <br />options include at least the following. <br />1) Current on -duty fire department engine company personnel, cross -trained in burglary and <br />injury -prevention; <br />2) Trained non -uniformed city employees; <br />3) Trained and authorized volunteers (police and fire cadets, senior citizen group members, etc.). <br />City preferences nationwide seem to focus on option 1. Cities surveyed do not anticipate hiring additional <br />personnel or paying overtime wages. <br />Cost Factors <br />The home safety and security analyses can be provided at negligible cost to the city; most cities cunenUy <br />have some such program. The only apparent direct cost, if existing employees are utilized in on -duty stalus <br />will be related to vehicle usage. It has been pointed out that salary costs for fire department personnel ha.c <br />already been incurred, and that fire and burglary prevention may be the highest and best use of s110 <br />personnel, so long as response to emergencies is not compromised. <br />