My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/01/02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/01/02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 11:08:48 AM
Creation date
3/20/2025 11:02:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/2/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PPS-6. MINNESOTA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE LABOR RELATIONS ACT (B) (cont'd) <br />Supervisors of public employees should have their management role <br />acknowledged and have their status limited to meet and confer. In no event <br />should supervisory or confidential employees he represented by an employee <br />organization which represents the employees they supervise. Further limitation <br />of the definition of supervisory personnel would mean that in all but city <br />manager cities, no employees could be considered to be supervisory employees for <br />purposes of PELRA. <br />slation be passed <br />which to review disciplinary action. <br />Employees presently have a variety of grievance procedures available to <br />them, including civil service systems, veterans' preference, and procedures <br />agreed to under collective bargaining. It makes little sense for an employee to <br />have two bites of the apple in challenging disciplinary action, particularly <br />when the standards for review of the different grievance hearings are as varied <br />as they are. The result under the current statutory system literally precludes <br />effective discipline of public employees. Requests for reform have been made <br />from many sources, most recently by the Minnesota Supreme Court. <br />Board be <br />The reduced case load of the PERB and its. recent actions in arbitrarily <br />changing the method of selecting qualified arbitrators have indicated that there <br />is no longer a need for the PERB. <br />PPS-7. LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL (B) <br />s anv increase in s <br />The current uniform state licensing system establishes adequate minimum <br />standards for law enforcement personnel. The League supports the continued <br />flexibility provided in the system to employ a class of peace officers who meet <br />specified requirements which are less than those for full-time officers and <br />allows upgrading of part-time officers to fully licensed status, as well as <br />allowing the POST Board to grant variances for political subdivision having <br />particular difficulties in complying with licensing standards to permit phased <br />compliance. Cities should retain responsibility for personnel matters and the <br />state should not unnecessarily complicate local personnel practices which have <br />worked well in the past. <br />-17- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.