Laserfiche WebLink
PPS-8. FIRE PERSONNEL. STANDARDS (8) <br />Fire suppression has traditionally been a uniquely local function in <br />Minnesota. Not only are firefighting problems vastly different from one <br />community to another, but well over ninety percent of Minnesota co®nunities rely <br />primarily on volunteer firefighters for fire suppression services. The League <br />believes that local governing bodies are beat equipped to determine the nature <br />of local fire risks, the level of local fire prevention efforts, and the <br />practical availability of firefighting personnel. Efforts by the state to <br />improve firefighting capabilities should be undertaken through increased <br />financial assistance to provide improved programs or by direct employment of <br />specialized personnel at the state level with such personnel made available to <br />assist local units of government. <br />PPS-4. MODIFICATIONS TO THE STATE FIRE CODE (B) <br />• <br />The League supports legislation which would clarify that it is the <br />responsibility of the state to inspect facilities open to the public such as <br />schools, hotels, lodging houses, hospitals, nursing homes, dry cleaners, and <br />motion picture theaters, whether or not it contracts with local units of <br />government to perform the actual inspection. 0 <br />The League also supports legislation allowing cities which do not have the <br />building code to require the installment of masonry fire walls between buildings <br />in the downtown business district or other high risk areas as an alternative to <br />adopting the more stringent fire code in the state building code. All foam <br />insulation sold in Minnesota should be required to clearly state on its <br />packaging that state law requires the foam to be covered by fire resistant <br />material. <br />PPS-I0. MODIFICATIONS TO THE STATE. BUILDING CODE (B) <br />should be made to the <br />dine aivine cities th <br />The League supports the current ability of non -metropolitan cities, <br />counties, and towns to opt -out of the inspection and enforcement <br />responsibilities mandated by the State Building Code. All architects and <br />engineers whc design any structure should continue to be required to certify <br />that the structure as designed complies with the state building code, <br />particularly the building access for the handicapped provisions. The legislature <br />should authorize the Commissioner of Administration to certify inspectors for <br />the building access provisions who are not fully certified as building code <br />inspectors. State fee inspectors should continue to be available from the state <br />for inspection, in areas outside of communities with local enforcement. <br />0 <br />