My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/03/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/03/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 8:44:57 AM
Creation date
3/24/2025 8:44:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/11/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2 <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT /I <br />Community Development Block Grant funds to entitlement cities <br />(those over 50,000 in population) may be cut by nearly one-fourth <br />under the Administration's proposed budget plan for FY86. When OMB <br />passed back the FY86 budget plan to HUD it recommended that in <br />addition to the 10 percent cut already proposed for CDBG, the <br />Farmers Home Public Facility Program should be transferred from <br />Agriculture to HUD, with no funding, and combined with the state - <br />administered small cities CDBG program. The current 70 percent - 30 <br />percent split for entitlement and non -entitlement jurisdictions in <br />the CDBG program would be changed to 60 percent - 40 percent. This <br />increases the cut for entitlement cities by 14.3 percent. Cities <br />funded through the small cities program would feel the impact of <br />this proposed shift as well, since they would be competing with <br />rural jurisdictions for funding. <br />PUBLIC TRANSIT <br />Based on materials obtained from the Office of Management and <br />Budget, it appears that the Administration is planning to propose in <br />February elimination, starting in FY86, of all public transportation <br />assistance, except for the $1.1 billion generated annually by the <br />one -cent gasoline tax set -aside. Under the OMB scenario, the $1.1 ' <br />billion, currently a discretionary program, would replace the $2.7 / <br />billion formula program. No operating assistance or new rail starts <br />would be permitted. The cut, if proposed, would represent a 71 per <br />cent reduction in federal transit assistance to cities. <br />HEALTH <br />A cut of almost eight percent below current services levels is <br />expected for the Public Health Service, a reduction of $386 million <br />from the FY85 level and $724 million less than the agency would <br />spend to keep programs operating at current levels. The cuts, which <br />extend across the Public Health Service, affect programs in the <br />Health Resources and Services Administration, the Alcohol, Drug <br />Abuse and Mental Health Administration, the Centers for Disease <br />Control, the Food and Drug Administration, and the National <br />Institutes of Health, formerly considered untouchable. <br />Entitlement programs will be cut in the FY86 budget as well. <br />The biggest cuts are expected in Medicare, scheduled to be reduced <br />by $4.9 billion in FY86 and $21.6 billion by FY88. The bulk of <br />savings will come from a one year freeze in hospital payments and <br />extension of the freeze on physician fees. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.