Laserfiche WebLink
OICONNOR & HANNAN <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />3aoo 103 TOWER <br />,o111L1314A <br />a J ! <br />�9 <br />Ync.00 <br />40 SOUTH EIOMTM STREET <br />\ r����'•'�•l <br />rrulM wuub..v. <br />10001•MN <br />,PM 1-,Ai01 <br />D.C. <br />MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA $5402-22 <br />V% ��1 1 <br />or -Iwo <br />��Y, <br />1W3 LI3113 <br />p a 11) 3-3aoo <br />col. au 611991 <br />TELEX E0-0541 <br />�` <br />,V•.g17 oqr <br />ow.•oo $0103 <br />TELEOD.IEA a1E 341-3600(1E4) <br />A) <br />01w110O,u <br />THOMAS 0. CREIGHTON <br />0A011A I, VWX <br />DIRECT DIAL NUMaE11 <br />-31.30.00 <br />(011) U11.1Ea• MEMORANDUM <br />r119• 43w3 <br />TO: City Administrators, North Suburban Cable <br />Commission <br />FROM: Steven Schmidt, Chair <br />Thomas D. Creighton, Legal Counsel <br />DATE: March 8, 1985 <br />RE: 1985 Budget Contributions of Each City <br />The Chair of the North Suburban Cable Commission has <br />requested that I communicate with each of you regarding <br />the 1985 city contributions to the Commission budget. As <br />you recall, the 1985 budget for the North Suburban Cable <br />Communications Commission was submitted to you in the fall <br />of 1984. In that transmittal the procedures of the Joint <br />Powers Agreement were explained that if a city did not <br />withdraw from the Cable Commission by the end of 1984, <br />the budget would be deemed to be approved. Some cities <br />affirmatively approved the budget, others chose to proceed <br />undar the Joint Powers Agreement's passive approval prc- <br />cess. At any rate the budget has been approved by all ten <br />cities. <br />The budget of the Commission has been funded in the <br />past by contributions from each city based on their number <br />of votes on the Cable Commission. After the city money <br />has been transmitted to the Cable Commission, it in <br />recovered from Group W as an advance on the franchise <br />J <br />