My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/05/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/05/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 8:52:36 AM
Creation date
3/24/2025 8:52:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/6/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AIAYOR ANI) CODNCII, <br />APRfL 3, 1985 <br />PAGR 'rW0 <br />The second changr_, and Probably the more important of the <br />two as it would relate to the city of Mounds View, is to <br />tiOn m the means by which noise is measured and a determina- <br />tion made as to whether or not a specific use is in <br />violation of State Noise Standards, The current Standards <br />and the proposed new Standards were explained to St b <br />Dave Kelso of the Minnesota Polwere Control to me <br />responsible for enforcement of y explanation of the thr. Noise Standards,y who is <br />L10 is that a noisecsource cannot exceed <br />which is describedasestablished by the State a cannodsexceed the decibel <br />out of an level <br />y hour, No more than one hour of <br />than six minutes <br />required and the MPCA assumes t of measurement is <br />maximum operations, hat monitoring is done during <br />considerin It can he assumed from this that, <br />g the current nperations at the Anoka County - <br />have a Airport, several nuisance -type noise incidents would <br />have to occur during a one hour period when noise is <br />measured in order for a determination to be made as to <br />whether or not a violation of the noise standards have <br />occurred, <br />The proposed new Standard would measure noise on what is <br />referred to as the L <br />Period and the amountq Noise is measured over a one hour <br />whether or of energy is averaged to determine <br />not a ✓iolation of the Standards has occurred, <br />give Mr, Kelso explained that such a measuring standard would <br />level gasacornpared)toto larger incidences at a hi her decibel <br />significantlythe L10 me <br />in ethod thus, one incident <br />of the State Standard could push the <br />average measurement over the one hour period over the <br />Standards. It would appear from this information that this <br />measurement State <br />me the measurement <br />would <br />be more useful for us in Mounds View duo_ <br />extremely bus relatively infrequent incidences except during <br />y periods of airport operations, <br />The MPCA has also, agreed to measure noise for airports using <br />the Ldn measurement, however, this will not supercede the <br />Leq standard, 1'he I <br />twenty -Four hour per�odmand uusinnt measures noise over a <br />formula determines whether or not a complicated logarithmic <br />hour period exceeds State noise over the twent Standards, y-four <br />Due to the fact that this is an extremely complex and <br />complicated issue I would be more than happy to answer an <br />questions you might have, however, it would be m <br />recommendation that. the y <br />these ro proposed City not submit an y <br />the fact that itrnisdSCaff'snts oopini m Noisethat thandardstdue nto <br />standards would be beneficial to our cause, Proposed <br />DPP/mjs/Mncl: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.