My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/05/20
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/05/20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 8:57:06 AM
Creation date
3/24/2025 8:57:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/20/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY CnuurU. <br />FROM: CLERK-ADM1141:;I'RA'I'tnt <br />DATE <br />JANUAIIY 31, 1911, <br />MUNICIPAL CUUt; Clln�''I'I•;RS 1, 21 4, 5, AND 6 REVIEW <br />SUBJECT: <br />This is the first of many in'in, i•urdums you will bw receiving <br />From Staff regardin,.l the rvvlvwmir.,,11, r.hapters of <br />pruyram, rl'he's <br />Municipal Code 1. 11 beL I, ow <br />procedures we will be Eollnwiml during the review will be <br />For Staff. members to n•viow th"Achapters which time <br />are <br />individually assigned rasp"nSi"ilil.y tc and, it time <br />permitmenthHeadrTeamne11Duerto,th"i <br />time srequirements o be dweyare <br />e <br />racing on the code review proyram any recommcnda';sly you <br />receive from City Staff will not have. been p <br />olls specifically <br />reviewod by thetcstYEeach <br />Atot thu memorandums will be <br />indicated. COP <br />carboned to the City Attorney with a request that, he review <br />er <br />therecommendations <br />a mmendatie that onchaIt nytsr'a,rarl'ado which lhePfeels wouldte in be <br />contrary to our best interest. <br />The memorandums you will receive will only indicate those <br />sections of the specific chapters which Staff feels needs to <br />be modified unless Start. is P "t�i�it�recerivanthe entire to <br />the entire chapter. Then, y <br />ou chapter shuest9onsloneourlrncrnmnendationsadditions. <br />or havo you <br />have any y coda r•:visions, <br />recommendations to make yours•.lt regarding <br />please discuss them with thc, Stitt member assigned responsi- <br />bility for that chapter. <br />AS indicated in the introduat.•'thlnSloand this <br />m`morandum, this <br />review covers chapters 1, 2, <br />recommendations with regard toIi•�n'Jes or modifications <br />to <br />these chapters are as follows: of <br />nding review <br />Chapter 1 - by City Attorn,t, Mt.Vorsl,eStaff iserecommending <br />no changes to Ihi:; chapter.. <br />Chapter 2 Staff would recommmend the following <br />changes. <br />1. 2•q1 REGULAR <br />,in�I l l(i tOin consideration of <br />last year ,when ChristmaS and New <br />Year's Rae w,cured on a Monday <br />evening and Council did not desire <br />to schudu1, o meeting for one of those <br />dates, that the second santonce of the <br />section ba revised to read as follows, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.