Laserfiche WebLink
(1) <br />STAMP REPORT <br />CASE: 174-85 <br />PAGE TWO DP THREE' <br />SETBACKS <br />Proposed structures, paving and curbing all meet minimum setback <br />requirements. <br />ACCESS <br />Applicant proposes one access point from Highway 10. Mn/UUT may not <br />approve this access. <br />DRAINAGE <br />The applicant's drainage calculations will be reviewed once Mn/DUT <br />approves the access to Highway 10. 1 &lf.,o P041L1 r� "k <br />ovnf l T,,fVtTvaTr AvrE r NdjrJ F.7C. IPA. ro jmpu t <br />PARKING <br />Applicant proposes 10 regular spaces. City Code requires 2 spaces. <br />Magazining or stacking space meets code requirements. <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS <br />1. The architectural appearance and tunctional plan of the building <br />and site will be similar to the existing buildings in the area <br />and not cause impairment in property values or constitute a <br />blighting influence. <br />2. Magazining or stacking space meets City requirements. <br />3. At the boundaries of the residential district, a strip of not <br />® less than 10 feet should be landscaped and screened in compliance <br />with Section 40.04, Subd. H, of the Municipal Code. My question <br />is, does the 6 foot wide strip of sod between the proposed <br />building and the R-4 zoned property to the west meet this <br />requirement? <br />4. There are no lighting standards proposed for the parking lot in <br />the area. <br />5. Parking or car magazining storage space shall be screened from <br />view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Section <br />40.04, Subd. H, of the City Code. My impression is that the <br />developer should provide additional buffering space between his <br />proposed car wash and the R-4 residential property. <br />6. The site will be blacktopped and sodded. <br />7. The City Engineer will review the drainage calculations once <br />Mn/UUT has approved the access to Highway 10. <br />10 11 --IW <br />i <br />