My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/10/21
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/10/21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:08:20 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 3:08:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/21/1985
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Rounds View City Council October 14, 1985 <br />Regular Meeting Page Three <br />---------------------------------------------------.t-------------------- <br />Motion Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the grant 11. Approval of <br />agreement contract with the Metropolitan Council Grant Agreement <br />lUl d JJiU P✓l 114111b YrLO & r Y1,L -•• <br />4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley read proposed 12. Approval of <br />Resolution No. 1944. Resolution No. <br />1944 <br />motionj5e:ond; Hankner/Quick w approve Resuiucion <br />Nu. commendingg melody Carlson for service <br />on the Festivities Commission. <br />4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley read proposed Resolution 13. Consideration <br />No. 1941, disapproving an increase in basic cable of Resolution <br />television service rates by Group W Cable of the No 1941 <br />North Suburbs, Inc. <br />Jerry Skelly, the City's representative to the <br />Cable Commission, reviewed the problems Group W <br />has had in marketing their program. He stated <br />that Mounds View is the only City to vote against <br />the passtive rate review. He also stated this is <br />a nationwide problem, with too much being promised <br />originally. He added he feels the use of access <br />to cable tv will be why Group W survives. He <br />compared the proposes' Y2 per month increase to <br />the cost of providing entertainment for a family <br />of four, and asked the Council to approve the <br />rate increase. <br />Councilmember Hankner reported the CounciJ has a <br />meating schediled ,nth Group W for 5 PM on <br />October 21, to tjur their facility and see First- <br />hand what their operation is, and she added the <br />Council had just received a packet of information. <br />from Group W, which they have not had ar. opportunity <br />to review. <br />Motion Second: Hankner/Quick to table acrion <br />to the c'o ex ?8, 1985 City Council meeting. <br />4 aye,; 0 nays M.)tior. Carried <br />Mr. Frits stated the people had come to the meeting <br />expecting this issue to be discussed and resolved, <br />and not to be tabled. <br />Councilmember Hankner replied the Council should be <br />given the opportunity to visit the facility and <br />review the information they have just been given. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.