My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1985/11/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
Agenda Packets - 1985/11/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:33:22 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 3:14:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/25/1985
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YAA // 9L— 4e nL <br />MEMO Tot ('lerk-Administrator dnd City Council <br />FROM: Director of Punlic W)rks/Community Development <br />DATEi November 21, 1985 <br />SUSJ ECTi nLECTRIC KViIIPMRN'ISVRVICF. COMPANY SEWER SERVICE <br />Last month, the City Council approved Electric Equipment Service <br />Cotspany's (EESC) request to construct a IU,000 square font <br />office/warenouse buildiny at 4751 Mustang Drive. Since that <br />time, their construction hide came in high and they had to revise <br />their drawings (Attachment 01). You will note on the attachment <br />that the site plan meets all City Code requirements. However, <br />because they moved their proposed building mouth on the site, and <br />hence, further away from their proposed connection to the sewer <br />and water mains. A review of how the building should be serviced <br />for water and sewer is necessary. <br />Ron Fagerstrom, Fire Chief, requires that a hydrant be placed at <br />the location indicated on the attachment. EESC is willing to <br />install an 8 inch water main in the City right-of-way to the <br />hydrant at no cost to the City. <br />The most cost effective way for EESC to provide sanitary sewer <br />service to their building is to install a service line diagonally <br />across their property (appruximate length equals 220 feet). An <br />alternative sewer service is to ,r.;tall a sanitary sewer parallel <br />to the water main in the City rtyht-of-way (see Attachment 01). <br />The advantages and disadvantages of each alternative is listed <br />below: <br />Install service line diagonally acress property. <br />Advantages <br />a) Cost effective solution. <br />b) EESC is responsible for cleaning/maintenance of the <br />majority of the length of the service line. <br />Disadlantages: <br />a) No future expansion capability. <br />b) Bad design because t,itee clean -outs are needed on the <br />service line and one clean -out will probaoly need to <br />he located in the parking lot (8U feet maximum between <br />clean -outs), <br />2. Install 8 inch sanitary sewer line down City right-of-way. <br />Advantages <br />a) Good for future expansion. <br />b) No :lean -outs are needed. <br />Disadvantages <br />a) City cleans/maintains more sewer line. <br />b) More expansive solution. The added cost is <br />approximately $1,40C (7u feet x S20.O0/foot). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.