Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds view City Council t j ! Cebruary 29, 198; <br />Regular Meeting UJ Vjtj & I V+ r ►.� Page Two <br />Clerk/Administrator rauley added that the City had le — <br />advised the owners that they would allow them to <br />build a parking area on the boulevard, but the owners <br />do not want to spend tae money. He added they cannot <br />prevent someone from parking in someone else's <br />driveway, and recommended the police be called, who <br />could then call a tow truck and ticket the offender. <br />Mayor Linke stated Director Thatcher would be writing <br />a letter to the apartment owners, advising them of <br />the problem. <br />Councilmember Hanknur asked Mr. Blaziak's permission <br />to include a copy of his letter, with his name and <br />address removed. Mr. Blaziak consented. <br />Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened 6. Spring Lake <br />Hearings <br />the public hearing on the Spring Lake Park Knolls Park Knolls <br />Addition. Addition <br />Director Thatcher explained that Leonard Kremer is <br />proposing to subdivide two lutb into six zero let <br />line lots. <br />Mr. Kremer reviewed the proposed development, <br />stating the hardship involved would be an economic <br />one, as they have had this property for several <br />years and the taxes continue to increase more than <br />they can raise the rents. <br />Director Thatcher stated the Planning Commission <br />has reviewed this and granted a variance on the <br />no:theast lot, since the County took a 13rge amount <br />of land from that piece of property to widen <br />County Road I. He added a few minor details arc <br />still required tron. Mr. Kremer before final <br />approval could be granted. <br />Mr. Kremer reviewed the plans they have for ponding <br />the site. <br />Director 'thatcher stated the existing storm water <br />retention pond does have meet existing City codes <br />as it does not provide a positive outlet, and the <br />new pond would be built to code. <br />Bruce Wolfe, 7685 Groveland Road, stated his property <br />abutts this proposed development and they have had <br />problems with ponding in the past and they have often <br />had standing water 3' deep on the property. He stated <br />the lard is too low to allow for any further development. <br />