My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/03/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/03/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:53:04 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 3:53:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/10/1986
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
February 24, 1986 <br />Mnunds View City Council page Three <br />Regular Meeting ------------------ <br />--------------------- --- <br />Mr. Wolfe presented a petition, with 22 signatures on it <br />A residents who arc against adding the proposed <br />additional double bungelow due to the water problems. <br />He added they have also experienced parking problems <br />in the area from the double bungelows. <br />Director Thatcher explained that if the existing hold- <br />ing pond is redesigned, it should eliminate the water <br />problem they presently have. <br />Mr. Kremer wed <br />constructedtand ewhere �t` hewatdrainage rwouldSflowmwould andwoAdd <br />pond. <br />Spiczka,Jeanette <br />zero lot linewas and and Ro <br />at <br />ad, asked <br />ity has anyhothors. <br />Mayor Linke explained what a zero lot line is. Director <br />Thatcher named some other locations in the City that <br />have a zero lot line. <br />Mrs. Spiczka asked if the Planning Commission was <br />required to notify the residents of the area that they <br />were discussing the request. <br />Director Thatcher replied the Planning Commission was <br />not required to do so, but the Council is and they <br />have done so. <br />Craig zuidema, 2809 County Road I, stated he feels <br />there is such a problem hey <br />ld <br />build another structurealready hat t <br />thereandnotadd touthenct <br />problem. <br />Mayor Linke st.at:d that the plans show the developer <br />would slope the drain -off duw:' and it should not <br />effect any of the residents. <br />Mrs. Spiczka stated the City was concerned about <br />a water problem there 10 years ago when they built <br />their home. <br />Mrs. Wolfe stated there is already enough of a <br />problem there, and another duplex would only add <br />to it. She stated she was also concerned with <br />placing another structure there, as it would <br />crowd the neighborhood. <br />Director Thatcher explained that the development <br />agreement would assure that the developer would <br />not create a problem. He added that it is to the <br />developer's benefit to do it right the first tiw— <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.