Agenda Packets - 1980/02/28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Page-4__-____ ____ March_19i_1980 dedication and purchase so that the City might continue 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT with funding. Out of 100 acres of land, this proposal REVIEWAL P.U.D. gives them 56 acres. They have studied the area needs (continued) for this land and it confirmed the City's designation of mixed P.U.D. Cremers further discussed the lake development. He noted that the City's Engineer recommended the deepening of the lake an additional two feet. He agreed with this, but stated the City would then be requested to participate. They would also be willing to allow the assessing of the additional cost, of which they would, in turn, be respon- sible for another approximate 40%. Overall, he felt their proposal was a plus to the community and that was Kraus-Andersons intent and style. If the City and Kraus -Anderson completed a preliminary concept agreement, they would immediately start the agency review process formally, as well as preparing for the P.U.D. process. Haake questioned whether the City should change the depth of the pond in lieu of the recommendation from S.E.H. Rose replied that, due to the necessity of outside agency reviewal and approvals, the City might accept the blue - line drawing as presented by the Applicant's Engineer. Upon receiving the agency reviewals, the City may then be more able to determine certain aesthetic values of the pond. To clarify the issue to what extent the Applicant would develop the proposed lake, he was asked if they would develop it at no cost to the City, pursuant to the blue - line drawing sumbitted by the Kraus -Anderson engineer. Cremers, answering for the Applicant, stated they would. Fedor discussed the residential land uses, feeling they might be better defined. Burmeister questioned the height of the elderly high rise proposal, stating that there were height re- strictions In our code. Cremers stated they would stay within the City Code or request changes. He further outlined that Kraus - Anderson mainly plans office buildings above County Road I, with the commercial development along Highway 10 to possibly include a food market, furniture store, hardware, etc. Kraus -Anderson was not interested In fast food establishments because they like to build and lease buildings.