Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNDS <br />VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Regular <br />Meeting <br />Page-9 <br />------------------------------------------------------------------ <br />March 121 1980 <br />Glazer <br />abstained because he felt there was not <br />6. PRELIMINARY <br />CONCEPT <br />enough <br />information about the pond. He would <br />REVIEWAL <br />P.U.D. <br />like to <br />have DNR and RCWD reports. He felt <br />(continued) <br />strongly <br />about losing the natural drainage setting <br />unless <br />it was proved to be necessary. <br />Rose reported that the applicant, John Miller, requested <br />7. MILLER INDUSTRIAL <br />the Planning Commissions input with regard to his <br />PLAT - Sketch plan <br />sketch plan. The general location of his parcel is <br />reviewal - Major <br />north of New Trunk Highway 10 and south of County Road J. <br />Subdivision (2 lots <br />The existing zoning is a combination of R-1, B-2 and <br />into 14) - Rezoning <br />1-1. The Comprehensive Plan had denoted the area <br />(R-•I to B-3 6 1-4, <br />Light Industrial. He further noted that the Judicial <br />1-1 to B-3) <br />Ditch #1 flowed through the property and that the <br />RCWD's initial review indicated development could <br />occur above the 899.0 elevation. Rose added that, <br />the RCWD was, however, reviewing that elevation for <br />potential change. The access proposed was a simple loop <br />in and out. MnDOT Is presently reviewing this with their <br />plans for new Trunk Highway 10. The soils, as noted in <br />earlier reports, Indicated limitations. <br />Miller, applicant for subdivision and rezoning, intro- <br />duced himself and just asked that the Planning Commission <br />offer any direction they could which would help him plan <br />for the development of his plat. He required or requested <br />no motion. <br />Haake asked what specifically Miller has planned for <br />uses. <br />Miller stated he had nothing definite but that he would <br />stay within the limits of the zonings requested. <br />Fedor wanted to see further review by the DNR and RCWD. <br />Burmeister wanted to hear MnDOT's comments with regard <br />to how this fits into the relocation process. <br />Miller stated that he would modify to meet their <br />recommendations. <br />Glazer also wanted to see further review by DNR and <br />RCWD. <br />McCarthy discussed the soils and their limitations. <br />Gary Comstock, engineer for Miller, requested that the <br />Planning Commission offer direction to Miller with <br />regard to the sketch plan. <br />l <br />