My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1980/02/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
Agenda Packets - 1980/02/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2025 12:36:35 PM
Creation date
3/31/2025 12:32:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/28/1980
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting <br />P29eA------------------------------------------------------------------Harch_1�s 1�80 <br />To add the following: <br />7, The developer shall submit DNR and RCWD <br />reviewals and recommendations to the <br />Planning Commission at their General Con- <br />cept Stage. <br />8. The Developer, upon completion of the <br />lake, shall dedicate it and the walkway, <br />properties to the City. <br />9. That the park land "swap, dedication and <br />purchase" occurs before June 1st. <br />10. That the developer submit information <br />necessary for the EAW at the General <br />Concept Stage of the P.U.D. process. <br />Glazer questioned the need for specific densities. <br />Motion to amend main motion by Glazer, seconded <br />by Fedor. <br />To modify M5 of main motion to read as follows: <br />5. That the proposed zoning for the parcel <br />will be roughly as presented to us to- <br />night, with the southwest corner being <br />R-1 and the middle residential designated <br />area will have no greater density than 4 <br />units per acre of its developable land. <br />The 3.0 acre area designated elderly mid - <br />rise will still be open to discussion. <br />Vote on second amendment. 5 ayes <br />2 nays <br />Burmeister voted nay because she wanted to con- <br />sider the densities at the Concept Stage. <br />Mountin agreed with that and also stated the <br />City did not have a zero lot line ordinance <br />which could affect those densities. <br />Vote on first amendment. 7 ayes <br />0 nays <br />Vote on main motion. 6 ayes <br />1 abstain <br />6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT <br />REVIEWAL P.U.D. <br />(continued) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.