My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1980/05/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
Agenda Packets - 1980/05/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2025 1:16:35 PM
Creation date
3/31/2025 1:12:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/22/1980
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MliMU TU: PLANNING COMMISSION I <br />FROM: MAYOR <br />llATE: April 30, 1980 -/ <br />RE: Wetland Preeervation <br />This memo eummarizee my viewe at thie time on the isaues of preser- <br />vation of wetlande and drainageways and the plan fos etorm water manage- <br />ment propoaed by the Planning Commisaion (theae viewe are based to cone- <br />iderable extent upon the Planning Commission report dated 2/11/80 and <br />the input from citizene at the Mayor's Committee meeting held on April <br />1 th.) <br />There ia no disagreement that it ie deaireable to preaerve wetlande, <br />in general, and neceasary to prevent diatruction of wetlanda and drain- <br />agewaye that are important to our exieting atorm drainage eystem. The <br />moet practical means for such preaervation appears to be full utilization <br />of governmental powere. In principal, Resolution 983 providea eignifi- <br />cant protection by mandating that development cauae no economic burden <br />to other property (interferettce with a drainageway, for example, obvioue- <br />ly would cauee auch a burdenJ. However, it ia generally recognized that <br />Resolution 983 neede to be expanded into ordinance form. We aleo need to <br />be better informed as to Khat powers are available from other governmental <br />unit. To thie ea3, Commiasioner Hamilton of Rice Creek Waterahed District <br />has agreed to maet with us when requested. <br />The queetion of eatabliahing new drainage facilitiea in anticipation <br />of additional load on our etorm drainage ayetem from future development <br />is a quite different and more contrnversial isaue. It has been euggeeted <br />that euch additional load will come from two eourcea even where on-eite <br />retention ar detention ia :equired in connection with future developmenL. <br />One of theee sourcea is said to be runoff from nex streets. However, it <br />hae been pointed out that developera have a"total aite" responaibility <br />under Reaolution 983: that ie, high runoff from new atreeta muet be balan- <br />ced by low runoff from the reet of the property ao that the total rate <br />of runoff ie not changed by the development. In practice, auch a balance <br />might not bt totally achievable rhere runoff before development ia very <br />lox or naw etreet eurface area ie very large; in any euch caeee it might <br />well be poeaible to divert flow from the etreets into local holding areae.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.