Laserfiche WebLink
Paas 2 ': <br />Fobrwry 27. 1980 ' <br />The-queetions lhae aill'have to be addreaaed are as follaws: <br />1. Since Naunda View has already contribuced with cash'for the developsent ; <br />of the outside facilittee, should we be e reoQt from providing"msintenance <br />for the aaid facili[y1 <br />2. Can lfounds Viev realistically afford to maintain additional acreage when <br />the City Malateaance-8udget ha been redt ed by approximately-6x over' <br />he last three yoarsY <br />3. Should the fity be reaponsible for maintaining achool district facillties . <br />for chon: eanctioned programe2 <br />4. Shauld,the City expect [he echQS±l district to provfde vell groomed and! <br />maintained facllities as part of the pe t agreemenc vhen it:is issuedl <br />5. Can the City be asked to provide a zgher level of maintenance on a school <br />dietrict facility than they carreaYly provide in ehe City park syetem?-' <br />6. In addition to ehe cash conGffiovt3on the City has made for Sdgewood, the <br />G1ty also hae expended a great dedl af in-kind eervicea as far ae etaff <br />time, equipment usage, and prieesz-rsynaulting wzk. Should t61s issue <br />be raised as part oF the City's coniributions to dste7 . <br />7. Since the City of lbunda Viea is currently the only cocmunity ehat hae a <br />Joint Povers Agree ent with the ecdool dietrict, should we ineist thst the <br />school dietrict adhere to the pulicy alseady in e etence? <br />The so t imporeant queeeion that the municipalitiee end schooi di trict are <br />vre tling vith is; which agency ia responsible for the athletic aswcistiont? <br />fie reason that ehie question is of mjor importance is that the akhletic aswci <br />tio u: are Che greatest ueer of the echool facilitiea and the ssjority of eb <br />athlatic a wciatione are organized on a achool district baels. <br />Stafi doe not foreeee ehe Commieeion being able to respond la detril to e eh ol <br />th qw tion raised by staff, but policy direccion aqd guidance i r quir d. %