My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/10/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/10/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 2:36:49 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 2:36:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/13/1986
Description
Regular Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounas View City Council v September 22, 1986 <br />RegulAr Meeting a B _ i ,.;,n Page Three <br />------------------------------ --- - --- = ------------------ <br />otion/Second: Blanchard/Rankner to approve the consent <br />enda, as presented, and waive the reading of the <br />:solutions. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Director Thatcher reviewed the reasons the Planning <br />Commission had denied the variance request for <br />Dynamic Designers. Ile stated Staff is in agreement <br />with the denial by the Planning Commission. <br />Motion/Second: 11aake/Quick to adopt Resolution No. <br />2006, denying the variances for Dynamic Designers <br />proposal, Planning Case No. 138-83, and waive the <br />reading. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked authorization to <br />send a letter to Mr. Boyles, stating the City's <br />formal policy regarding his Code violation on his <br />property. <br />Motion/Second: Quick/Linke to approve sending the <br />letter to Mr. Boyles, with a clarification in the <br />+tier stating that as a result of the information <br />jmpiled by the survey, the City Council has <br />determined there is no justification for modifying <br />the current City Code. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Director Thatcher reviewed proposed Resolution No. <br />2087, and the need for cleaning Judicial Ditch No. 1, <br />Branch No. 5, and he reviewed the process that would <br />be followed in cleaning the ditch. <br />There was discussion among the Council of the cost for <br />this cleaning, and future cleaning and repair of the <br />ditch. <br />Motion/Second: Nankner/llaake to approve Resolution <br />No. 2087, regarding City Project No. 86-6, repair of <br />Judicial Ditch No. 1, Branch No. 5, and waive the <br />reading. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />�_i <br />9. Approval of <br />Consent Agenda <br />Motion Carried <br />10. Considarati-on <br />of Rslt. No. <br />2086 <br />Motion Carried <br />11. Approva Letter <br />to James Boyles <br />Motion Carried <br />12. Consideration <br />of Resolution <br />No. 2087 <br />Motion Carried <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.