Laserfiche WebLink
PPS-5. Military Leaves (11) <br />that the statutes be amended <br />Under current law i•.S. i92.26 and 192.261) a city employee, as well as <br />other public employees, is entitled n leave with full pay and accrual of <br />seniority status and other benefits for all the time that employee is engaged in <br />short-term (15 days or less) military service and at this same time receives <br />full military pay. Cities, particularly those which must hire part-time <br />replacement employees when others take military leave, suffer a significant <br />financial hardship not shared by private sector crplo5ars who are not required <br />to provide short-term paid military leaves. <br />Public employees should only be required to pay the difference between the <br />employees military pay and their regular wage for this 15 day period. Any <br />longer leave period should be without pay and the accrual of seniority and other <br />benefits should be suspended for military leaves beyond 30 days. Current law <br />which provides for mandatory leaves and reinstatement after wars, declared <br />emergencies, active duty training, and duty training should be changed to <br />provide for mandatory leaves and reinstatement only after wars and declared <br />emergencies. Employees should not be entitled to leave and be reinstated for <br />active or inactive training duty. <br />PPS-6. Time and Distance Residency Requirements (B) <br />The <br />(' job necessity for certain employees to reside close to the city. <br />In recent years the Legislature has limited the authority of cities and <br />other local units of government to impose residency requirements for their <br />employees. The Legislature has recognized, however, the need for insuring the <br />ability of certain employees to be available to respond to emergency situations. <br />In 1984, in the same bill which prohibited non -metropolitan cities from <br />enacting blanket residency requirements, toe Legislature specifically allowed <br />non -metropolitan cities to enact, reasonable area and response time restrictions <br />if there were demonstrated job necessities for employes to reside close to the <br />city. Unfortunately, a drafting error prohibited metropolitan cities from <br />enacting these restrictions. In 1985, the Legislature acted to allow <br />metropolitan communities to impose reasonable time and distance requirements for <br />volunteer firefighters. <br />The result of the 1984 and 1985 legislative actions is a situation where <br />metropolitan communities still cannot impose reasonable time and distance <br />requirements for their police officers, paid firefighters, or any employee with <br />the exception of volunteer firefighters. <br />The League recommends that the Legislature grant metropolitan cities the <br />same authority granted non -metropolitan cities to impose reasonable time and <br />distnnce requirements where the city can show a demonstrated job -related <br />necessity. Because these requirements must pass this difficult test and <br />/ directly affect the public safety of the community, these requirements should <br />t tinder no circumstances be considered as mandatory subjects of collective <br />bargaining. <br />-51- <br />