My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/11/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/11/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 2:41:15 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 2:41:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/10/1986
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR - TREASURER BRAGER <br />DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1986 <br />SUBJECT: GENERAL FUND BUDGET TRANSFERS <br />Jt,J 5 <br />The City recently received billings and paid $11,300.00 for <br />worker's compensation audits to First Insurance Twin <br />Cities. Payment of $1,766 was made for the period May 1, <br />1984 - April 30, 1985 and payment of $9,534 was made for the <br />period May 1, 1985 - April 30, 1986, Corporate Risk <br />Managers, Inc., our insurance consultants and I had disputed <br />the 1984-e5 audit since August 1985 due to incorrect classi- <br />fications of several employees. At that time the audit <br />indicated an additional premium of $4,671 was due. The <br />corrected audit billing was $1,766 and results in a savings <br />of $2,995 to the City. The 1985-86 audit requested an <br />additional premium of $ 9,534 due to underestimation by the <br />agent of payrolls for police, parks, and recreation <br />employees. <br />These additional premiums are billed because of the manner <br />in which worker's compensation premium payments are <br />handled. At the beginning of the policy period a deposit <br />premium is paid for that period based upon estimated <br />payrolls. At the end of the policy period our payroll <br />records are subject to audit by a representative of the <br />insurance company and a premium is calculated that is based <br />on actual payrolls. That premium is compared to the deposit <br />premium and, in this instance, we are billed for additional <br />premiums. <br />The insurance account, 100-190-4480, will be approximately <br />$500 over budget upon payment of the final installment of <br />this year's premiums. Staff requests a budget transfer of <br />$11,800.00 from contingency to the insurance account to <br />cover these budget overages. <br />Another problem area in the budget involves the purchase of <br />a new Civil Defense Siren. The 1986 Budget anticipated <br />purchase of a new siren at a cost of $35,000 to be financed <br />by a loan from the Special Projects Fund. The loan was to <br />be repaid over a five year period. The siren was purchased <br />at a cost of $20,839. At the time the siren was ordered we <br />learned that we would be receiving Revenue Sharing monies in <br />1986 which we had not budgeted for. Revenue Sharing was to <br />be used for fire protection services and the amount saved by <br />using Revenue Sharing rather than our own funds, $39,225, <br />was transferred to contingency. Staff proposes to ammend <br />*-he 1986 Budget to take into account these events which <br />occurred subsequent to it's adoption. They are: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.