My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/12/01
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/12/01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 2:42:24 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 2:42:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/1/1986
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
--- East Metropolitan Joint Venture Proposal -- <br />' 2. Organizing the Joint Ventura. <br />Affiliation <br />The SEED Council would be affiliated with the various chambers <br />of commerce In the East Metro area, In conjunction with the <br />communities themselves. it would be organized as a "public - <br />private partnership" reporting In function to the boards of <br />directors of the area chambers of commerce. This structure <br />would have the following advantages: <br />The chambers bring the voluntary efforts of top area <br />executives, Industrial development leads from several <br />sources, an In -place long-range development planning <br />structure, and existing organizations which cross municipal <br />borders. <br />Independent status would allow for fund raising <br />possibilities beyond existing chamber members, and a <br />greater degree of management flexibility than would <br />otherwise be possible. <br />Accounting support for the Council would also be provided by the <br />Saint Paul Area Chamber. <br />Management Structure <br />A Management Committee would oversee the organization. It will <br />consist of 15 to 16 key leaders from the Chambers and the <br />communities (elected officials, city managers, economic <br />development commission chairs, etc) that would be agreeable to <br />all of the partners. The assumption Is that It would be broadly <br />geographically representational. This Committee would report to <br />the various chambers' boards. <br />Revision 7, 11/17/86, Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.