Laserfiche WebLink
8/4/88 <br />13 <br />to municipalities to encourage them to produce programming that is <br />more eoaplex than meeting eablecasts <br />4. providing access to equipment and facilities for municipal <br />users <br />5. providing assistance in promotion and outreach efforts <br />to municipalities <br />6. assisting in defining and meeting resource needs for <br />municipal access <br />7. cablecasting government access programs system wide <br />C. Educational Access (TSD z82, 623, 621) <br />1. initiating information sessions on educational access <br />opportunities <br />2. providing access to aauipment and facilities for special <br />pro je& s <br />3. providing assi tance in promotion <br />4. initiating sessions to plan for equipm.nt./facilities needs <br />D. Educational access (higher education and non-public <br />schools) <br />1. coordinating schedule for the higher education and <br />non-public schools channel, currently designated as Ch. 66 <br />f.. 2. providing information on evaluation and promotion as <br />requested <br />3. assisting with updates (if necessary) of CGS <br />and associated <br />equipment <br />4. visiting institutions periodically to assess needs and view <br />operations <br />E. Library access <br />1. providing production assistance, and consulting regarding <br />evaluation, promotion, and procedures upon request <br />incorporating library access schedule on program guide <br />3. visiting libraries ;eriodically to assess reeds and view <br />operations <br />F. All community access users <br />1. organizing and conducting special events (awards, <br />evaluations, etc.) <br />2. programming a master schedule for all community access <br />programming on the channel currently designated as the discrete <br />public access channel; <br />3. a<imini.stering a grants program providing monies and/or <br />production services to community organizations: institutions, or <br />individuals <br />Measuring Corporation Performance <br />4.� <br />Commission members discussed the ways in which the performance of <br />an access management entity could b.,r.eas+ired in relation to the <br />standards set for <br />c9mmunity <br />access i <br />ed <br />performance indicatorsthat willbeusedctooMembers determinethe degreeof <br />success of the corporation. The actual numbers and percentages left <br />