Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />8/4/88 <br />The most important performance indicator i <br />1. _% increase in the number of hours <br />of locally -produced programs cablecast on <br />educational, and library channels <br />17 <br />n this category is: <br />of initial showings <br />the municipal government, <br />Other performance indicators are: <br />1._ periodic activity review and feedback sessions that are <br />held with school district, higher education, and non-public school <br />representatives <br />2. _% increase in the number of hours <br />of programming from other sources cablecast <br />3. number of sessions held periodically <br />for school district access users <br />4. _% increase in the number of events <br />municipal government user: <br />B. number of sessions held periodically <br />municipal government access users <br />of initial showings <br />on educational channels <br />to assess the needs <br />programs produced by <br />to assess the needs for <br />6. number of consulting sessions re: government access <br />programming held with municipal users <br />that are held <br />7. _% increase in the number of hours of initial showings <br />of programming from other sources cablecast on the municipal access <br />channel <br />8. _% increase in the number of messages displayed on the <br />government access channel <br />9. _ periodic contacts with library, higher education, and <br />non-public school access users made <br />10. _% ircrease in the number of hours of initial showings of <br />locally-prcducedprograms cablecast on the library access channel <br />11 _% increase in the number of messages displayed on the <br />library access channel <br />Corporation Resources <br />Egc.ipment, facilities, human reso•arees, capital funds and operating <br />expenses from many sources plus channels are part of the cr.rsent <br />community access effort in the North Suburbs. These resources are <br />listed in & endix D. <br />In order to determine the need for modification of current <br />resources for community access equipment, facilities, and <br />operations, the Commission members solicited comments from several <br />parties and persons involved or potentially involved in community <br />access. The Commission staff sent a survey questionnaire to 200 <br />persons in January, 1988 inviting specific comments. Those <br />contacted included active users of the community access channels <br />and equipment, those who have been trained in video and who have <br />not produced programs following training, North Suburban Access <br />Committen representatives, video users clubs, and those who have <br />received grants from the North Suburbs Access Corporation. <br />Commission members also solicited comments from the current access <br />staff of Cable TV North Central. Specific questions posed to the <br />