My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1988/08/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
Agenda Packets - 1988/08/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2025 9:31:30 AM
Creation date
4/9/2025 9:31:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/22/1988
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8/4/88 Appendix C-Page 7 <br />c. successful access operations could provide a positive <br />image for the company within the community <br />d, company may have easier method of bicycling <br />videotapes from one community to another through its other systems <br />e. access to technical staff regarding signal <br />distribution problems could be easier <br />f. franchising authority can enforce/oversee access <br />operations <br />g. access to higher quality production expertise.and <br />equipment could be available through local origination resources <br />2. Disadvantages <br />a. management support for access staff could be lacking <br />du-i to the coar"onpoorcepticnz that mmu''nit7 acceSS ie a finnnniaj_ <br />drain and therefore not in keening with the company's mission, and <br />that access violates the operator's first amendment rights <br />b. enforcing access provisions could be difficult <br />bec, se company controls the information needed by the franchising <br />authority <br />C. when access and local origination share facilities, <br />resources generally flow to to based on its potential profitability <br />d. a disincentive to promote access opportunities <br />exists, as successful promotion causes operator to provide more <br />resources to support access <br />E. ACCESS MANAGED BY A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION <br />1. Advantages <br />s. mission of management entity is solely .focused on <br />providing access services <br />b. Board of Directors could be designed to represent <br />community characteristics, thereby drawing diverse segments of the <br />co-mmunity into production <br />c. non-profit corporation is likely to attract volunteer <br />help <br />d. structure could be more flexible in changing <br />the focus of access services over time as needs change <br />e. corporation could be structured so that all types of <br />users have control over its operations <br />f. controlling Board could be designed to represent <br />users of all types of community access <br />2. Disadvantages <br />a. staff and financial resources could be diverted <br />from providing actual services due to the need for performing <br />administrative tasks and raising funds <br />b. facilities may need to be provided independently, <br />thereby increasing the costs of access <br />c. corporation could have to motivate a franchising <br />authority to enforce some access provisions <br />d. time is needed for -new corporations to earn a <br />positive community image and for Board members to learn to work <br />together <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.