Laserfiche WebLink
October 10, 1988 <br />page Seven_----__- <br />Mounds view City Council _ <br />Regular Meeting--------------- lain- <br />- - we considerations <br />reviewed® Mr, KoPPY reviewed the encies re at. Those <br />ing there are four insure <br />re uiations are District, <br />this to insure reCreek Watershed View• <br />reviewing would l,- the Rice <br />and City of Mounds <br />agencies Engineers, but the addition <br />Army Corps or En9 would be mape,create 2.9 acres <br />7 acre encroachmenland area would <br />A and in the uP <br />of the P <br />of new wetland. would occur, <br />Mr. KoPP_ where the encroachment expansion P <br />v showed future on the Pro - <br />explaining that due to i eline the P <br />explaining Williams Placement on Department <br />and the location of a Highway <br />perty, they were restricted 1°County based on their <br />with the Ramsey being <br />They have met the access to the property roadway <br />fanning would result in the also <br />and arc P which They arealso <br />acre. <br />on the wetland <br />s of Engineers, who has Placed <br />in <br />on the wetland e Corps thewho <br />encroachment raould <br />working ''r.th the Property- their <br />stakes on the Prop atiards, he rej1enother 3 acres <br />and <br />both Type 2 and 7 w which would create � over <br />mitigation proP°Sal bring the total up to <br />ofne wetland, which would <br />of new wetland. required <br />g acres of new ts <br />reviewed ota <br />the list of other perm, MinneI <br />Mr. KopPY aratment of Health, Commission, <br />Metro Waite Control He <br />from the Minnesota Dency, of Mounds view. <br />Pollution Control A9 the City each and every one <br />a County, MnDOT and with s ecific <br />Rams-y. intend to aPPIY requesting <br />explained they encies and foliowill also be <br />of the different ag He added they <br />permitting process. <br />a pUD for the site' plans for <br />Administrator Pauley reviofwed the View. He also <br />City Mounds week and <br />^Clerk/•Road J with'.n the the report last with <br />County Barr had received will be meeting <br />explained it.. Staff possible, and <br />has be revicwin9week, or as soon ageyers and Attorney <br />them sometime this both Attorney Meyers <br />d l.t the <br />they will be including He added he <br />Kaey w in the discussions. was scheduled' <br />Council know when the meeting their re - <br />Mr. KoppY stated they wpenaiee submitthe9prelim4estions <br />after responded to 9 <br />to the various a9 He also rasp I£ was agreed <br />quests proved- submitted. attached <br />plat has been aP. been s would be <br />from the EA W "''ich had the <br />.,.,i1 :hat addendum?kalandaadjacent to <br />by the Cp,,..__ Pa... <br />regarding the undeveloped <br />Prop development, which are <br />discussion on the soil borings <br />presently- Their findings are consistent <br />There was already available. <br />being done P <br />v with what information is what capacity the <br />780'7 Bona P.oad, asked explained the <br />Kay, Weisman, Mr. Seipp needs for i <br />buiding will be used at. <br />their growth <br />first building should m <br />