Laserfiche WebLink
10: ` AYOR AND CITY COUNCIL L <br />aa- <br />i <br />r ROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR PAUL- <br />JANUARY 25, 1989 <br />SUBJECT: LEGISLATIVE ISSUES <br />Two legislative proposals have recently come to the attention of City <br />-toff �.hich :+^ `•eel should be brn,ight to vour attention prior to your <br />discussion of�a legislative program at the February 6th Agenda Session. <br />These issues and an analvsis of them is provided below for your <br />consideration. <br />I. Code of Ethics <br />Senator Mart•: from Roseville has introduced a bill, S.F. 5, which <br />is intended to establish a Code of Ethics for state and local <br />government officials. Attached please fund a copy of the - <br />legislation and a bulletin frorm the League of Minnesota Cities <br />regarding the financial disclosure provision of the bill. Tne <br />idea of a cede of ethics for government is not a new issue. Many <br />levels of government throughout the U.S. and professional <br />organizations have codes of ethics. The plan for the State to <br />establish a code applicalbe to all uits of government smacks of big <br />brother particularly when the code requires detailed personal - <br />financial disclosure which is classified as public information. _ <br />Senator Marty's bill has many good paints, but staff must take <br />ii objection to the proposed financial reporting requirements. The <br />contents of the LMC Bulletin has been reviewed with the City's <br />Department Heads and the City Attorney. It was a unanimous feeling <br />among these individuals, who may be individually impacted by this <br />legislation, that these financial reporting requirements <br />are an imposition of unnecessary requirements on local officials. <br />At the present time, the State has in place certain laws, rules and <br />regulations that require the performance of certain tests by our <br />auditors during the annual audit to confirm that no conflicts Exist <br />and the filing of statements from local officials regarding <br />interests in contracts. Attached please find correspondence from the <br />City's auditors outlining the current requirements and audit <br />tests used to determine if any conflicts have occured. <br />It was also felt by the staff members I discussed this with that the <br />issue of a code of ethics and financial disclosures for local units <br />of government should be the business of local government and not <br />imposed on us by the State. Finally, the information that must be <br />provided was felt to be overly broad, an invasion of the privacy of <br />the officials personal lives, and could be used, if the information <br />became public, by individuals to place pressure on officials whose <br />personal finances might be stretched and are susceptible to being <br />pressured. <br />Also attached is an excellent letter from Rob Tautges of the City <br />Auditor's office regarding current legal requirements and audit <br />practices related to conflicts of interest. In the end, Mr. <br />Tautges' statement that the desire to keep their personal <br />finances private might discourage qualified individuals from <br />seeking elective or appointed public office is well taken. <br />