My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/06/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/06/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2025 3:05:13 PM
Creation date
4/16/2025 3:05:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/5/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Certain issues remain to be resolved by council. These include ) <br />finalizing funding sources, the desire for a public meeting, <br />right-of-way acquisition method, and final decisio„ un the <br />typical section for this project. Funding has been proposed to be <br />from NSA funds; however, a percentage of storm sewer costs may <br />not be eligible. These costs could be funded by the Storm Water <br />Management fund. <br />finless costs o: the project are to be assessed, there is no legal <br />inrequirement ff <br />formational meeting Publicor a nd all e affected There esid nts were notified• <br />The council may desire to hold an additional public informational <br />meeting and the consultant has indicated they would be available <br />for a presentation. The council will be asked to recommend <br />approval of the study report and project. <br />Right-of-way acquisition will be necessary in Mounds View. Ramsey <br />County s policy requires the City to acquire the necessary rigt- <br />of-way. Anoka County is acquiring the right -oP-wap in Anoka h <br />County. Anoka County has offered to assist us in appraisals and <br />acquisition. This would be especially important in appraisals t:o <br />insure consistent appraisals along the project. i believe it <br />would also be beneficial in negotiations if we work with Anoka <br />County through the acquisition process. <br />The alternatives to consider regarding the typical section are <br />the number of lanes and the areas to have sidewalk. Alternate 1 <br />listed in the study report is A 4 lane section with curb and <br />gutter. Alternate 2 is a 3 lane section with shoulders and curb <br />and gutter. Both sections would be 52 feet in width. Currently <br />sidewalk is only proposed from the west City limits to Spring <br />Lake Road. This could be eliminated or extended easterly to the <br />limits of segment 1. No sidewalk is currently proposed on <br />segment 2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.