My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/09/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/09/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 11:10:07 AM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:10:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/5/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
/3 <br />MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI <br />FROM: CLERK-ADMINIST M <br />DATE: AUGUST 28, 1989 <br />STUDENT PRESENTATION ON COMMITTEES/ <br />SUBJECT: COMMISSIONS <br />As a result of earlier direction by the City Council I <br />contacted the Chairpersons of the Parks aTask nd eForce land <br />appointing students <br />Commission and the Environmental Quality <br />I have since received <br />requested their reaction to the idea o aPP ort on <br />to their commissions or committees, <br />responses from these individuals <br />las those ofuthe uotherkcommissions <br />their positions as well a - <br />who had previously commented on this item. <br />Commission whulaheartedly endorsed the idea of <br />The Planning <br />on their commission but preferred <br />having students servingad <br />order <br />that theseindividuals <br />serve on an .erminationsofnquorum nor <br />that they The Planning <br />have binding votes on the commission. <br />Commission also suggested that a member of the commission be <br />responsibilities of the <br />assigned to ea�heSt" <br />activitis aaoennd respto assist them in <br />understanding plays in relationship to <br />Planning Commission and the role <br />y <br />the activities of the City ported <br />The Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously sup <br />the idea of student representation and agreed with the <br />should <br />iserve as ad hoc <br />ncluded in the determination of quorum <br />that students <br />Planning Commission <br />members not being votes. The Commission also endorsed the <br />nor having binding appointed as mentors. <br />idea of members being pP ed the appoint - <br />The Environmental Quality Task Force eTask Fg <br />ment of student representation on the Task Force with e <br />lThe Task Force <br />limit of 2 members. felt that allowing a <br />non -binding vote foreview after these student <br />mrepresentatives would be <br />appropriate with a <br />sehould be non -binding <br />d the idea of student <br />The Charter Commission also endors <br />representation but felt that theart of the quorum, <br />representatives not considered P ,s four standing <br />Based upon the positions taken by the City <br />commissions and committees, staff would request Council <br />direction on this matter. <br />DFP/MJS <br />t, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.