My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/10/16
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/10/16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 11:16:16 AM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:16:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/16/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
^ MEMO TO: Planning Commission <br />FROM: City Planner Herman <br />DATE: June 17, 1988 <br />SUBJECT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR <br />A CAR WASH AT 2155 HIGHWAY AVENUE <br />PLANNING CASE NO. 241-88 <br />In reviewing the proposal for the gas station, Staff has looked <br />Into the question regarding two structures being on one lot. In <br />Chapter 40.04, Subd. C(4) it states that "except in the case of a <br />planned unit developments as provided for in Section 40.24 of <br />this Code, not more than one (1) principal building shall be <br />located on a lot". Therefore, Amoco's current proposal does not <br />conform to Code because the car wash and gas station building are <br />separate buildings. However, in 40.04, Subd. F(1), it states <br />that "an accessory building shall be considered a integral part <br />of the principal building if it is connected to the principal <br />building by a covered passageway". I believe that if a covered <br />passageway was proposed, that the two buildings could be <br />considered one principal building per this section of the Code. <br />In reviewing the file for the Amoco Station, in a memo from Steve <br />Rose in 1981, it states that the parking spaces required are a <br />total of 10. This would be 6 spaces for the convenience food <br />store and 4 for the gas station. On the original site plan for <br />the proposal, 8 spaces were shown where the parking spaces are <br />currently shown on the newly proposed development with 2 in the <br />northwest corner where the car wash is proposed to go. This <br />would mean that the site plan would have to be revised to allow <br />for 2 additional parking spaces. <br />In regard to the question if a blower system should be included <br />as a condition on the permit, the Planning Commission should look <br />at the affect upon Program Avenue. The traffic on Program Avenue <br />will be increasing as the Business Park develops. It is believed <br />that Program Avenue will be a major access road for tenants in <br />the large TransHealth building and the building directly to the <br />south. In terms of the circulation on the Amoco site, the cars <br />after being washed will be exiting directly onto Program Avenue. <br />According to Chapter 40.05, Yard Requirements, in a B-3 zone a <br />side yard is 10 feet unless the lot is on a corner in which there <br />is a 30 foot setback. This would require the car wash to be set <br />back an additional 15 feet from the Program Avenue lot line. <br />In reviewing the files, I could not find any comment on the <br />question about non -conformity on the sign at the Amoco Station. <br />Therefore, it is unclear that the sign is non -conforming. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.