My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/11/20
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/11/20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 11:19:30 AM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:19:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/20/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STAFF <br />REPORT o� Founds �ew. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DATE: October 18, 1989 <br />AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 2 (Agenda Meeting) <br />CASE NUMBER: 281-89 <br />APPLICANT: Vernon L. Hall <br />REPORT PREPARED BY: City planner Firen <br />PROPOSED REQUEST: Applicant Requests a Minor Subdivision <br />LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2186 Bronson Drive <br />Mr. Vernon Hall has applied for a minor subdi <br />Property he owns at 2186 Bronson Drive. vision for the <br />Reouired Proposed Require_ ment Met <br />Minimum Lot Area <br />(corner) 12,500 SF 13,360 SF <br />(interior) 11,000 SF 11760 SF Yes <br />Minimum Lot Width , Yes <br />(corner) 100 feet 84 feet* <br />(interior) 75 feet 140 feet Yes <br />Yes <br />*Section 40.04, Subd. C(3), indicates that a platted lot or <br />parcel of land of record on or prior to May 9, 1960, which does <br />not meet the requirements of this Code as to area, width, or <br />other open space may, if it is properly zoned, be utilized for <br />single family detached dwelling purposes provided the <br />measurements of such area with their open space are within 70 <br />percent of the requirement under the terms of this Code, but said <br />lot or parcel shall not be more intensively developed. Such <br />existing lots that fall within 70 percent of the requirements and <br />have lot widths less than required by this Cote shall be <br />permitted to have side yard setbacks in the same percentage <br />proportion as the lot width reaches the requirement of this <br />Code. In no case shall the side yard setback be less than five <br />feet. <br />4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.