My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1987/08/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
Agenda Packets - 1987/08/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2025 10:14:41 AM
Creation date
4/28/2025 10:13:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/24/1987
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' ! 77 Aug•.Ist 24, 1997 <br />Mbunds View City Council UPgg . '� i Q"' Page Thirteen <br />,, <br />Regular Meeting ----------------- <br />/y Attorney Meyers replied all conditions would have to <br />with all similar <br />be in the ordinance and be uniform <br />in the City. He added he has informed <br />businesses would <br />Mr. Povlitzki and his attorney that the City <br />the restaurant <br />like to return as close as possible to <br />originally run in that location, <br />operation that was <br />incidental. <br />with liquor being <br />Mr, zwieg asked whether the previous owner was suing <br />the City. <br />he has heard they <br />ehtheiraliquorsider- <br />ingoanley awsuitrsasetCity tookd away <br />license. <br />yr. Zwieg asked why the taxpayers should have to pay <br />down. <br />legal fees to get the operations closed <br />whatownershaverights <br />Attorney Meyers replied the <br />eer property <br />also, and the zoning is proper <br />has requested. <br />Povlitzki also pointed out that times change and <br />Mr. <br />with it the types of businesses. <br />Attorney Meyers pointed out that Mr. Povlitzki is aware <br />by the City and will <br />that he will oe watched closely <br />have to conform. <br />had e <br />Tim White, 5249 Greenfield, stated the ciaut owner <br />the p <br />same problem for several years with <br />top the <br />sandlmake <br />and stated the Coinnin surethefproblems�ldolon <br />beg 4 <br />from the very <br />not repeat. <br />Linke answered that w ile the city <br />Mayor ms, they cannkeeprovide <br />assurances there won't Beni <br />close eye on the op <br />1 <br />Councilmember Hankner reviewed the history of problems <br />did not <br />with the previous owner, and why the Council <br />him. <br />reissue the liquor license to <br />White asked the Council to rezone the property to <br />Mr. <br />get a better type of business there. <br />Mr. Povlitzki stated he was more than willing to sell <br />they could open what- <br />the property to the residents, and <br />like, or knock down the building <br />ever business they would <br />He said he'd Gladly sell if.. he could <br />if they wanted to. t. He added <br />i:e ores _ '.his <br />just break even on what epoinnerate an income. <br />have the business open to g <br />that he must <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.