Laserfiche WebLink
'Q01 <br />RS-3. Elimination of Levy Limits A <br />Largely to compensate for expected rises in local levies, the 1987 <br />Legislature imposed an extremely stringent three percent levy limit on <br />cities for payable 1988. This levy limit, applied also to small <br />cities, is severely limiting cities' abilities to compensate for cuts <br />in state and federal financial aid as well as making it nearly <br />impossible to deal with rising costs resulting from various state <br />mandates, including comparable worth and the newly-imposed'six percent <br />motor vehicle excise tax. Although the legislature provided for an <br />appeals process allowing certain adjustments to cities' 1988 levy <br />limit bases, it appears the Revenue Department will not provide to <br />cities the adjustments which the law permits. <br />Despite assurances made during the legislative session that tightened <br />levy limits would only be imposed for one year, the new law actually <br />imposes additional levy limit restrictions in future years as well. <br />These additional restrictions include the arbitrary lowering of the <br />five percent inflation cap to three percent and the permanent <br />inclusion of smaller cities under the levy limit law. If such <br />stringent levy limits are continued, then the legislature should <br />continue to provide for an appeals process. <br />Levy limits have made it difficult for many cities to adequately plan <br />for, and respond to, changing conditions. Federal cutbacks, rising <br />insurance costs, costs of comparable worth salary adjustments, and <br />other factors force cities to adjust their budgets and levies. Levy <br />limits prevent some cities from ujing property taxes as a source of <br />revenue to provide for adequate reserves or absorb increased costs. <br />Local elected officials are accountable to the public and should be <br />entrusted to responsibly use their taxing authority. Cities exist in <br />a very dynamic, changing environment. They are expected to quickly <br />respond to changing federal policies, state mandates, court rulings <br />and market forces, such as those affecting tha: insurance industry. <br />Statewide limits artificially constrain the options available to <br />elected officials and are too inflexible. <br />Given uncertainties in state and federal financial aids, and the <br />diverse problems and circumstances faced by cities, levy limits are <br />unworkable. These limits are inconsistent with the principles of <br />local self-government and accountability and should therefore be <br />repealed. <br />- 55 - <br />