My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1987/09/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
Agenda Packets - 1987/09/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2025 10:17:18 AM
Creation date
4/28/2025 10:17:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/14/1987
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RS-4. Sales and Motor Vehicle Excise Tax Extension !A) <br />__------- t.,net nnvarnments to pav the six percent <br />in 1987, the governor proposed extending the six percent sales and <br />s and other local <br />motor vehicle excise tax to purchases mad, by <br />government units. While rejecting the sales tax proposal, the <br />legislature did accept the motor vehicle excise tax plan, effective <br />with city purchases of vehicles made after May 31, 1987. <br />Forcing local governments to pay the state sales tax amounts to one <br />level of.yoverrment taxing ar.ither. This increased sales tax will <br />directly result in increased local property taxes. In defending the <br />governor's sales tax proposal, the Revenue Department argued that the <br />increased local costs caused by the sales tax would be relatively <br />insignificant, and thus would not necessitcte increased property <br />ague demonstrated <br />taxes. However, a special survey conducted by the Le <br />the governor's plan would have cost Minnesota cities a very h <br />significant amount--$32 million per year, twice the cost estimated by <br />the Revenue Department. Given these findings, it is clear that k <br />imposing the sales tax on local government purchases would increase <br />property taxes. <br />R3 5 State Administrative Costs (B) <br />All state government costs should be subject to the standard <br />appropriation review process and be funded directly by specific state <br />appropriation, not by a broad deduction from property tax relief <br />programs. -vlhiie decisic-S on the necessary staffing and funding <br />levels for state agencies are made by the appropriations committees, <br />tax policy decisions should be handled by the tax committees. <br />When state administrative costs are financed through the local <br />government aid (LGA) appropriation, funds available for property tax <br />relief are reduced, defeating the purpose of LGA. In 1987, such state <br />costs included the unprecedented large sum of $419,200 to fund the <br />state avditor's office and certain Department of Administration <br />functions related to local government. In 1988, $423,700 i,:= due to be <br />deducted from LGA allocations for the same purpos ns. In the case of <br />the state auditor's office, earmarked deduction;: from LGA are being <br />used to finance over 40 percent of 1'ie al'9itor's state -appropriated <br />budget, an inappropriate action in the League's opinion. <br />Furthermore, LGA funds are being used to finance auditor and <br />Department of Administration operations which do not relate to cities, <br />but to all local governments ---counties, school districts and <br />townships. The WA program is largely designed for and used by cities. <br />Other state programs --county income W.sparity aids, school aids-- <br />- 56 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.