My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1987/07/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
Agenda Packets - 1987/07/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2025 12:27:11 PM
Creation date
4/28/2025 12:27:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/13/1987
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO 110: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR <br />PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY <br />DATE: APRIL 20, 1987 <br />RE: GROVELAND TENNIS COURTS LIGHTING <br />Today, Steve Rose and I met with Mr. Jim Strohmeier, President <br />of Pierson -Wilcox Electric Co., Inc. I asked Mr. Strohmeier to <br />offer some ways to change the specifications on lighting for <br />Groveland Park tennis courts to bring the cost down. Here are <br />his recommendations: <br />1. Use wooden telephone poles rather than metal poles. The metal <br />poles require cement and metal plates, etc. The poles would <br />simply be set in an augered hole. <br />2. Use a standard time clock rather than a beefed up control <br />system. The standard time clock is more than sufficient and <br />reliable for this designated use. <br />3. Use hps (high pressure sodium) 400 watt fixtures. The color is <br />an orange -yellow tone but it should not affect the game play. <br />The fixtures are very good looking and mount on the pole. It <br />was suggested that four fixtures be mounted on a cross board on <br />each pole. <br />Rather than re -spec the project, Mr. Strohmeier offered an <br />alternative. The alternative is to contract out labor supervision <br />while using two City employees to supplement labor. Also, the City <br />can sometimes purchase materials cheaper and without sales tax which' <br />will provide a savings. The use of City equipmnent such as a <br />trencher would also save money. The contract could be written with <br />a "not to exceed" clause. It was estimated that it would take about <br />two weeks of non -steady time using two public works employees to <br />finish the project. This arrangement would cost about $9,000. <br />(Please refer to the pricing sheets cost.) <br />The other alternative of re -specifying and re -bidding the project <br />would probably run $10,000 - $14,000 depending upon the bids. <br />The Groveland Park Foundation has offered $4,000 for this project. <br />The additional funds of approximately $5,000 could come from the <br />Park Dedication Fund. <br />Ms/sl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.