Laserfiche WebLink
l'-- - �December 14, <br />1987 <br />Mounds View City Council UNAi i & page Four <br />Regular Meeting -------------------------------------- <br />----••--------------------------- <br />proposal. is not in compliance with the City's <br />the wetland is <br />Wetland ordinance. The boundary of <br />the developer's plat. of great <br />not accurate on <br />concern to me is the fact that the Army <br />importance and <br />Corp of Engineers permit has been rescinded. Given <br />these concerns and other questions raisedapproveyBarr,this <br />Council can possibly <br />don't think that the <br />proposal -as it is before us today. I urge other <br />"no"." <br />members of this Council to vote <br />Jim Senden, representing the Harstad Company on the <br />the histpry of the <br />Greenfield Estates project, reviewed <br />stating they have granted <br />project over the past year, <br />vember 16, <br />City extensions twiceesentedand taaverbalt on oreport <br />the <br />the City's consultant p-- <br />the Harstad Company <br />regarding the project and requesting <br />and make changes to the <br />to do additional studies <br />preliminary plat. He stated this was done, as <br />and was <br />requested, at a cost to the Harstad Company, <br />December 4. lie further <br />presented to the City on <br />December 7, the Council considered the <br />stated that on <br />revised documents and decided additional time was <br />time, Barr <br />needed to study the changes, and at that <br />report, and the Council <br />Engineering presented a partial. <br />Harstad Company agreed, that more time <br />felt then, and <br />to study some of the changes. <br />was needed <br />Mr. Senden stated they acknowledge that some of the <br />madein the <br />changes were necessary due to some errors <br />he requested <br />original calculations, and <br />time for the City to consider the new <br />extension of <br />stating that it should be presented and <br />the <br />material, <br />fully considered before any action is taken on <br />matter. <br />Mr. Senden reviewed some of the changes that had been <br />the ditch on the <br />made, and he discussed the impact of <br />they do not need an outlet or ditch <br />property, stating City an <br />ey <br />for cleaned. <br />accessleasementpsonthatuthehditchdcouldwbehe <br />Mr. Senden explained that one of the items Barr had <br />requested be don(! was to have the area <br />�estaked, which was ane,aof thethe <br />devalopment <br />restaking, it was decided some of the boundries <br />which would <br />would have to be moved in some areas, <br />He reviewed those changes <br />then change the layou,. <br />made, due to both the recon- <br />that were subsequently <br />figuration and to meet requests of the area residents. <br />A and B <br />He stated they are still proposing outlots <br />their variance request. <br />be deeded to the City to offset <br />F , <br />