Laserfiche WebLink
LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES, !NC <br />7501 Golden Valley Road <br />/'ti Golden Valley, Minnesota W27 <br />( • � 612/546.1470 <br />���ipll 1213/S , <br />• December 10, 1987 <br />TO: Don Pauley, City Manager 1, <br />City <br />of Mourls View <br />FROM: C. F. Smytge�(Consultant <br />SUBJECT: STANDBY PROVISIONS IN STANTON <br />GROUP V PUBLIC WORKS LABOR AGREEMENTS <br />You requested on December 10, 1987 information with regard to the <br />manner in which Stanton Group V Cities deal with Standby <br />Pay/Obligations in their public works Labor Agreements. <br />Enclosed is the information you requested. Some cities require the <br />standby person(s) to perform certain duties as part of the standby <br />duty; somo cities do not, and only require availability for call out <br />wl <br />duriug the standby period. many cities have no provision in their <br />Labor Agreements. The absence of a provision cannot necessdrily be <br />interpreted to mean that the city has no standby duty requirement for <br />certain of their public works employees. Some cities with no Labor <br />Agreement provision do, in fact, have a standby requirement, <br />Minnetonka for example. Minnetonka requires employees to take turns <br />on standby duty as a 'condition of employment" stated on hire of new <br />employees, and pays no additional compensation for such duty. <br />if I can be of further assistance please let me know. <br />CFS:hfa <br />Enclosure <br />