Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council <br />.Regular Meeting , <br />-------r._-'--5------------------------ .. <br />Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the recommen- <br />dat ons made in the November 19 memo regarding a <br />change order on Mounds View Project 87-4, County Road <br />I Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Attorney Mevers had no report. <br />Councilmember Hankner reported she would not be at <br />the December 14 meeting, as she would be on <br />vacation. <br />Councilmember Hankner reported the residents from <br />around Silver View Park had met with the Forester <br />to discuss plantings that would go around Silver <br />View Pond, and they seemed pleased with what was <br />proposed. She stated the work should be done in <br />the spring. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated she had also talked <br />to the Forester about some trees that appear to be <br />dying of oak wilt, and while the test results are <br />negative at I.his time, he will keep a close watch <br />on them. <br />November 23i 1987 <br />Page Four <br />--------------------- <br />Motion Carried <br />12. Report of <br />Attorney <br />13. Reports of <br />Councilmembers: <br />Councilmember <br />Hankner <br />Councilmember Hankner reported she had attended the design <br />evening at Pinewood School on November 18 for their new <br />playground. She stated that she hopes the City can be an <br />active participant in the project. <br />Councilmember Hankner reported she had been given a notice from <br />the Mounds View Wetlands Preservation Committee, and that while <br />she knows it was sent out be well-meaning people, some points <br />need to be clarified or corrected. She added that all meetings on <br />this subject have been public and open to residents and concerned <br />citizens, and the Council has spent approximately 9 hours in <br />public heaL�ngs or citizen informational meetings. She proceeded <br />to point out corrections. One correction is a statement regarding <br />an upgrade project of the storm sewer system. She stated that the <br />Council ik, not at this time undertaking a major project and that <br />in meetings with citizens who are interested in such improvements <br />the Council informed residents of how to proceed toward any sLorm <br />water management improvements. She reviewed briefly some of the <br />recommendations made by the John Johnson study, regarding the storm <br />sewer project proposed in 1978, and the cost which was projected <br />to be $2-4 million, plus land acquisition. <br />Councilmember Hankner clarified the date at which <br />action will be taken by the Council, on December 14, <br />and she stated she regrets si,e will not be at that <br />meeting to vote on the issue. She also explained <br />the notification orQcedure the City uses for <br />L.. <br />