My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1987/12/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
Agenda Packets - 1987/12/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2025 12:47:27 PM
Creation date
4/28/2025 12:47:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/14/1987
Description
Regular Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council I <br />Regular Meeting <br />---------=----------------------- <br />November 23,'1987 <br />Page Six <br />------------ '------ ------ <br />n <br />Councilmember Hankner stated she has spoken with <br />other mayors, and she would like to see a forum for <br />all the Councilmembers to put together a resolution <br />that they all agree on. She added they need to <br />lobby Mounds View's position before trying to get <br />everyone to support it. <br />Mayor Links stated there is a meeting scheduled at <br />the New Brighton City Hall at 7 PM on November 24, <br />sponsored by Commissioners McCarty and Salverda, to <br />discuss the library issue. <br />Duane McCarty gave an update to the Council of where <br />the issue is currently, stating he feels the the <br />discussion is down to one issue, of what will become <br />of the Roseville facility. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated this item was not on <br />the agenda for this evening, and she felt it should <br />have been postponed, to allow for public input. <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated she was in favor of <br />acting on the resolution, as this gives the CouIity <br />direction from the City. She added it is not <br />written in stone but it gives the library board <br />something to work with. <br />.Councilmember Quick stated he agreed with Council - <br />member Hankner's comments, the the item was not <br />`listed on the agenda, and he would like to get <br />:together with the Council's Prom the northern <br />'suburbs to discuss the options and come to a <br />.mutual agreement. <br />Councilmember Wuori stated she felt this was a <br />direction for the City �60 go, and they should <br />(continue their efforts for action by the library <br />board. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated she was not necessarily <br />in opposition to the resolution, but she felt <br />(strongly the item should be listed on the agenda, and <br />,I•he issue should be discussed with the other cities, <br />before action is taken. <br />Councilmember Quick stated he is 100 percent behind <br />the library, but that he is just opposed to the <br />mechanics of this resolution. <br />Q.111 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.