My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1988/05/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
Agenda Packets - 1988/05/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2025 11:42:24 AM
Creation date
6/16/2025 11:32:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/23/1988
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />RESOLUTION N0. 1327 <br />CITY OF COUNTY fOFNDS II <br />RAHSEY <br />STATE OF 11INNESOTA <br />RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCE APPEAL FOR DYNAMIC DESIGNERS, <br />38 <br />7656/7660 VIOODLANN DRIVE, HOUNDS VIe ealedGace <br />CASE N- varianldenial <br />UHEREAS, Dynamic Designers have apppp <br />to build two fourplexes at the properties commonly known as <br />7656/7660 :9oodlawn Drive; and between the lot size <br />11HEREAS, there is a discrepancy 1985, and that of <br />scaled off on the site plan dated January 12, <br />the Ramsey County records; and <br />UPEREAS, the existing proposal would require the following <br />approvals: <br />1) 11aive the minimum lot size for subdivision in a <br />wetland zoning districtas . <br />d at <br />2) Uaive theminimum <br />ml ofine fortsubd. idinger <br />withina wetland <br />building setback <br />a-., zoning district. <br />that all structures <br />3) waive the requirements we be <br />set back at least 100 feet from a designatedd wetland. <br />q) The existing proposal needs aconditional use permit <br />for filling within a flood plain. <br />5) The existing Propo,alWrequiresand a wetla <br />riesa alteration <br />permit to change <br />11HEREAS, Staff, City Consultants, Planning eCommission and <br />City Council have extensively reviewed the proposd development; <br />and extraordinary <br />WHEREAS, the City Council dons not find any <br />which do <br />circumstances as presented which apply to the property <br />and, <br />not apply to other properties in a wetland zoning <br />therefore, cannot grant a variance from the minimum lot size <br />within a wetland; and any extraordinary <br />1)HEREAS, the City Council does not find property which do <br />resented which apply to the P pdistrict and, <br />circumstances as P in a wetland zoning <br />not apply to other properties within a <br />therefore, Cannot grant a variance from the minimum lot width as <br />measured at the building setback line for subdividing <br />wetland; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.