Laserfiche WebLink
ewim <br />FA <br />b) Minimum Lot Width - 125 Feet as Measured at the Building <br />Setback Line <br />The development as proposed does not meet this require- <br />ment (except for Lot 4, Block 4). However, in <br />Illustration #1 the developer did show that this <br />requirement along with the 20,000 square feet size <br />requirement could be met. The replatting to meet these <br />requirements would allow for 13 lots. <br />c) All Structures Shall be Set Back at Least 100 Feet From <br />the Wetland <br />This proposal requires filling of the wetland and the <br />placement of principal structures within the 100 foot <br />buffer. <br />Chapter 48.06, Subdivision. 3, Permit Standards. <br />Barr Engineering has reviewed the Harstad proposal <br />relating to all the requirements of Chapter 48. Because <br />Harstad Company owns the entice wetland, equal apportion- <br />ment is not an issue. <br />Chapter 48.06, Subdivision 3, A(2). <br />Total filling shall not cause the total <br />or as <br />The development as currently proposed does not fulfill the <br />phosphorus stripping requirements. Although Barr <br />Engineering has informed City Staff that if some modifica- <br />tions xre made to the plan, the development could meet <br />phosphorus stripping requirements of the ordinance using <br />the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District method- <br />ology. This could be achieved through the use of "dry <br />ponds". This approach would fulfill the phosphorus <br />requirement, but would not be beneficial to the City and <br />it would seem goes against the intent of the ordinance. <br />e' <br />