Agenda Packets - 2025/08/04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Housing Maintenance Code and Nuisance Code define how one healthfully lives in and maintains a structure and the outside areas. As such, the Property Maintenance Code and Nuisance Code are essentially environmental health protection codes as the hygiene of housing, correspondingly, is an area that deals with people's most intimate living environments, their homes, and neighborhoods. Into the fabric of housing hygiene are woven a wide variety of health, safety, economic, social, and political factors. Housing and Nuisance codes have additional challenges inasmuch that they contain important social, cultural, and psychological aspects which pertain not only to construction standards but also the legal rights of citizens; social responsibility; and how problems in one neighborhood, home or building might affect property values, crime and other issues in the entire community. The end goal of Housing Maintenance and Nuisance Code adoption is the eventual elimination of any substandard conditions within the home, neighborhoods, and community. This end cannot be reached effectively without adequate resources, establishing priorities, and measurable goals. Nearly 35-percent of the housing stock in the City of Mounds View is non-owner occupied and rental property. Additionally, a significant amount of the housing stock in Mounds View is aged over 50 years and a majority was constructed prior to 1980. As these structures grow older economics dictate their income-producing potential for owner's decreases, thereby decreasing maintenance funds and increasing their rate of deterioration. This view of outside deterioration is a symptom of this inner struggle and is parallel to a cycle intimately related to social disparities. Often the cycle results in homeowners and tenants that have financial means moving on to newer areas with newer neighborhoods, homes buildings, and resources leaving behind deteriorated buildings, homes and neighborhoods. This cycle gives emphasis to a continued downward trend until all that remain are debilitated structures and homes and a decreased quality of life. Housing and property maintenance programs tend to fall into two categories: proactive and reactive. The proactive approach attempts to determine if conditions exist that require intervention prior to a downward trend in housing or property conditions. Reactive programs respond to complaints about housing and property conditions. Most Cities do not start off with the notion that they will fall into disrepair, as such many Cities navigate into housing and property maintenance programs with a reactive approach. Reactive or complaint driven programs satisfy the people making the complaint or referrals and may help to improve a small part of the neighborhood, however, they do little to bring about systematic change and improvements to the entire City due to their unsystematic method. Often in reactive driven programs staff find themselves involved in neighborhood disputes or tenant/ property owner disagreements, causing more serious inspection requests to be delayed.