My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-07-17 Agenda & Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
1997-07-17 Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2026 2:56:23 PM
Creation date
4/10/2026 2:54:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br /> 111 FROM: MARY SAARION <br /> DATE: JULY 11, 1997 <br /> SUBJECT: GREENFIELD PARK ISSUES <br /> There have been two issues from residents living adjacent to Greenfield Park that the Parks and <br /> Recreation Commission needs to address. One issues is the foul balls that continue to go into the <br /> yards of neighbors from baseball use at the baseball field. Balls are being hit down the third base. <br /> foul area into yards as well as continuing to be hit over and behind the backstop and netting. <br /> Residents have complained and are frustrated because the problem continues. They have asked <br /> for a solution to the problem. <br /> Greenfield Baseball Field is used by permit only to teams that are older, requiring a pitching <br /> mound. This is basically youth 13 - 18 year olds, the Babe Ruth age and Town teams. Each <br /> coach is required to obtain a permit, to come in for a key to the field and comply with the field <br /> maintenance duties. There are a number of teams that use the field - all are association teams and <br /> not city sponsored teams. This means that the associations receive registration fees and not the <br /> city. To date, no part of the associations'registration fee revenues is forwarded to the city for <br /> maintenance, equipment or capital expenses. On the other hand, city sponsored athletic <br /> programs charge as part of the fee, monies that go into the maintenance and equipment of ballfield <br /> 111 activities ie. New bases, chalk, ag-lime, etc. <br /> It is evident that additional netting is required along the third base out of bounds area(along the <br /> park boundary) to keep balls out of the properties. The cost for netting, poles, cable, attachments <br /> and installation is (Mary is obtaining estimates). One option is to request <br /> the associations to pay for all or a portion of the additional netting. The other option is to put <br /> additional netting in the capital budget. <br /> There has been precedent in the past of youth associations contribution monies for the <br /> improvement of fields that they use. The Little Lakes Little League has providing funding for <br /> additional fencing at Oakwood Park which is a field that they use. However, neither the Irondale <br /> Baseball League nor the Babe Ruth or town teams contribute funding for fields, even though they <br /> receive registration fees of which a portion could be dedicated to assist with field maintenance <br /> costs and capital improvements. <br /> I would like to have the Parks and Recreation Commission discuss this issue as there will need to <br /> be a decision on how to pay for and deal with the problems that occur at Greenfield Park duc. <br /> balls damaging properties adjacent to Greenfield Park. <br /> Another issues that goes hand in hand with damages is property damage coverage - to be required <br /> by all youth associations that use city fields. Many cities require associations to have property <br /> • damage insurance to cover the costs of broken house and car windows, car dents, fence damages, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.