Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />March 23, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br />1 IV. PUBLIC HEARING. <br />2 <br />3 Mayor Faust opened the public hearings for Resolution Nos. 10-025, 10-026, and 10-027 at 7:03 <br />4 p.m. <br />5 <br />6 Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, provided an overview of the 2010 Street Improvement <br />7 Project. He discussed the project schedule, project cost, and funding sources, the assessment <br />8 amount of $110,008.92, and the assessment process in accordance with Minnesota Statutes <br />9 Chapter 429. <br />10 <br />11 Mr. Hubmer reviewed Resolution Nos. 10-025 and 10-026 for consideration by the City Council. <br />12 <br />13 Councilmember Stille requested a recap on the engineer estimate in relation to the current <br />14 competitive environment in the market. Mr. Hubmer stated the original engineer estimate <br />15 included in the feasibility study was approximately $1,900,000 for the St. Anthony portion of the <br />16 project. This estimate was reduced, and bids on the project then came in at $1,375,000. <br />17 <br />18 Mr. Jim Christy, 3472 Silver Lane, addressed the City Council and stated his request that the <br />19 2010 Street Improvement Project include curb cuts on every corner. He also requested that the <br />20 traffic signals and street signs be located far enough back to accommodate wheelchair access. <br />21 Mr. Hubmer stated that the project will need to meet ADA standards. There will be proper <br />22 pedestrian standards and crossings and there may be an opportunity to include midblock <br />23 pedestrian crossings in a couple of locations. In regards to the placement of traffic signals, the <br />24 signal at Silver Lane and Silver Lake Road is not proposed for replacement at this time. <br />25 <br />26 Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates, provided background information on 429 assessment <br />27 bonds as the typical method of financing street reconstruction projects. She stated total project <br />28 costs of the 2010 Street Improvement Project are approximately $1.3 million, and that the City <br />29 will be assessing approximately $110,000 to benefiting property owners. Since the amount <br />30 being assessed is not at least 20% of the project costs, the City will be financing the <br />31 improvements through street reconstruction bonds instead of the typical 429 assessments bonds. <br />32 It is proposed that the City issue General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds to finance the <br />33 entire remaining balance of the project not being paid by assessments. Ms. Kvilvang provided an <br />34 overview of the requirements for proceeding with the GO Street Reconstruction Bonds, <br />35 including the requirement that the City Council hold a public hearing and approve the 5 -year <br />36 Street Reconstruction Plan (SRP). Ms. Kvilvang indicated that the project cost has been reduced <br />37 from the $155,000 included in the staff report to a cost of approximately $118,000 to $120,000. <br />38 <br />39 Ms. Kvilvang reviewed Resolution 10-027 and 10-028 for consideration by the City Council. <br />40 <br />41 Councilmember Stille clarified with Ms. Kvilvang that the interest rate on the assessments will <br />42 be at a rate of 2.0% above True Interest Costs of the bonds. <br />43 <br />44 Mayor Faust closed the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. <br />45 <br />