Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />May 25, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br />2 A. Resolution 10-033• Approving the Request for an Amendment to the Silver Lake Village <br />3 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Sign Plan to Allow for the Modification of Existing <br />4 Ground Signs and the Addition of One Directional Ground Sign. Applicant: St. Anthony <br />5 Retail Development. <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />Planning Commission Member Craig Poucher reported on the concept review and public hearing <br />held by the Planning Commission on the request for an amendment to the Silver Lake Village <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD) Sign Plan to allow for the modification of existing ground <br />signs and the addition of one directional ground sign. He reported that a 41 year resident of the <br />City spoke at the public hearing regarding his concerns about safety and clutter resulting from <br />the additional signs. Mr. Poucher stated the Planning Commission voted in two separate motions <br />on the proposed amendment to the Sign Plan: 1) The first motion was made and approved by <br />majority vote, the proposed modification of existing ground signs and the addition of a ground <br />sign at 3800 Silver Lake Road; 2) The second motion was made and approved by unanimous <br />vote, the addition of a directional sign as proposed by the applicant. <br />Commissioner Poucher presented the site plan and Photoshop examples of the requested signage. <br />Commissioner Jenson inquired about the concerns expressed at the public hearing regarding a <br />potential obstruction of view. Commissioner Poucher replied that most of this concern was in <br />relation to the proposed new directional sign because it is located at an intersection. There could <br />also be concern with the proposed location of the new ground sign where traffic will be entering <br />the parking lot. <br />City Manager Momson clarified that the proposed amendment covers two new signs and <br />modifications to two existing signs. <br />Mr. Dale Wenkus, Vice President of Architecture with Doran Companies, and Ms. Brenda <br />Thomas, Vice President of Property Management with Doran Companies, were present to <br />answer questions of the City Council. <br />Councilmember Stille verified with Ms. Thomas that a two foot increase in height is proposed <br />for the Cub sign, which includes the one foot addition and one foot cap. <br />Mr. Wenkus stated for clarification, it is proposed that six feet be added to the Cub sign, which is <br />located at the most northerly corner. It is proposed that one foot and a one foot cap be added to <br />the sign in front of Smash Burger. The third sign along Silver Lake Road would be similar in <br />design to the existing sign in front of Smash Burger. <br />Mayor Faust questioned why the resolution states a height of 31 feet for the Cub sign while the <br />amendment being proposed includes a height of 26 feet. Mr. Wenkus explained that the original <br />PUD included approval for a monument sign at a maximum of 31 feet in height at this location. <br />It was elected to only put in a sign that is 20 feet high. The request now is for an additional six <br />feet in height, which remains within the 31 foot height restriction that was originally included in <br />the CUP. <br />