My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 07082014
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2014
>
CC PACKET 07082014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2014 7:44:29 AM
Creation date
7/2/2014 1:53:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
7/8/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
70 <br />Table 2 <br />Residential Collectors' Reported Fees vs. Proposed Fees - Before Taxes <br />(Units: $ per household per month) <br />Sources: <br />(a) Residential Collectors' Annual "Garbage Hauler/Recycling License" applications <br />as submitted to the City (average of three collectors' reported rates, weighted by market share); <br />(b) Table l "Subtotal " of collector proposed fees (trash + recycling) <br />The reported fees as summarized in Table 2 provide one means of comparing proposed <br />contract prices for base trash collection fees in Table 1 (both tables are before taxes). The <br />weighted -average from Table 2 of reported prices is $18.45 per household per week. The <br />average proposed fees (trash + recycling) from Table 1 is $18.00, or about 2% lower than the <br />current reported prices weighted average. <br />Another means of comparison was offered by the collectors. They estimated the "current <br />market prices" for trash + recycling (before taxes). The collectors' estimates of "current <br />market prices" for weekly trash service were: $19.12 for a small trash cart; $20.60 for a <br />medium trash cart; and $21.92 for a large trash cart. This results in a simple (i.e., <br />unweighted), average of $20.55 from the collector's "current market prices" (weekly trash <br />cart service only). The difference between this "current market price" average and the <br />proposed (Table 1) average contract prices for weekly trash + recycling service is $2.55 per <br />household per month ($20.55 - $18.00) or 12% of the collectors' estimate for "current market <br />prices." <br />Our understanding is that the three companies compiled an average of selected trash rates <br />currently charged to City residents for purposes of comparing "current market prices" to their <br />proposed contract prices. The source/raw data were not provided to the City, only a <br />"Summary of Current Monthly Market Price Savings." We understand that `current market <br />prices" include collection and disposal costs but not taxes. <br />It is important to note the collectors are comparing current "open hauling" rates as paid by <br />customers to the proposed prices for the City contract. What residents pay may not be the <br />same as what the City could pay its contractor within a potential future contract. The City <br />will have additional administrative costs (see discussion and estimates above) that are not yet <br />Proposed <br />Percent <br />Current <br />Trash + <br />Change ('/.of <br />Reported <br />Recycling <br />Current <br />Trash Service Level <br />Prices (a) <br />Subtotal (b) <br />Re -ported) <br />Small trash cart (weekly) <br />$17.26 <br />$15.97 <br />-7% <br />Medium trash cart (weekly) <br />$18.61 <br />$17.88 <br />4% <br />Large trash cart (weekly) <br />$19.50 <br />1 $20.14 <br />1 3% <br />Average (weekly levels only) <br />$18.45 <br />1 $18.00 <br />1 -2% <br />Sources: <br />(a) Residential Collectors' Annual "Garbage Hauler/Recycling License" applications <br />as submitted to the City (average of three collectors' reported rates, weighted by market share); <br />(b) Table l "Subtotal " of collector proposed fees (trash + recycling) <br />The reported fees as summarized in Table 2 provide one means of comparing proposed <br />contract prices for base trash collection fees in Table 1 (both tables are before taxes). The <br />weighted -average from Table 2 of reported prices is $18.45 per household per week. The <br />average proposed fees (trash + recycling) from Table 1 is $18.00, or about 2% lower than the <br />current reported prices weighted average. <br />Another means of comparison was offered by the collectors. They estimated the "current <br />market prices" for trash + recycling (before taxes). The collectors' estimates of "current <br />market prices" for weekly trash service were: $19.12 for a small trash cart; $20.60 for a <br />medium trash cart; and $21.92 for a large trash cart. This results in a simple (i.e., <br />unweighted), average of $20.55 from the collector's "current market prices" (weekly trash <br />cart service only). The difference between this "current market price" average and the <br />proposed (Table 1) average contract prices for weekly trash + recycling service is $2.55 per <br />household per month ($20.55 - $18.00) or 12% of the collectors' estimate for "current market <br />prices." <br />Our understanding is that the three companies compiled an average of selected trash rates <br />currently charged to City residents for purposes of comparing "current market prices" to their <br />proposed contract prices. The source/raw data were not provided to the City, only a <br />"Summary of Current Monthly Market Price Savings." We understand that `current market <br />prices" include collection and disposal costs but not taxes. <br />It is important to note the collectors are comparing current "open hauling" rates as paid by <br />customers to the proposed prices for the City contract. What residents pay may not be the <br />same as what the City could pay its contractor within a potential future contract. The City <br />will have additional administrative costs (see discussion and estimates above) that are not yet <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.